Dependency Law Finder

Florida's dependency statutes, court rules and DCF operating procedures, with the appellate opinions that apply them

data.robertlathamesq.org · All tools

Before you use this site

This site aggregates legal authorities from a variety of public sources. It is AI and human reviewed. Text processing errors can occur. Always check the information here against the official linked source.

This site is publicly available. Use for general research only. Do not submit confidential or identifiable case information.

I don't agree: show the official sources

B.B. v. State718 So. 2d 399 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) · 4D98-0390

Court
4th DCA
Decided
1998-10-14
On CourtListener
718 So.2d 399 (1998)

B.B., a child, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 98-0390.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

October 14, 1998.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Anthony Calvello, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

B.B., a child, appeals from his adjudication of delinquency and commitment to the Department of Juvenile Justice after the trial court found he committed the delinquent acts of escaping from a halfway house and obstructing an officer without violence. We reverse B.B.'s commitment because the trial court failed to consider a predisposition report (PDR) as required by section 39.052(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1997). B.B. v. State, 647 So.2d 268 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). The requirement of a PDR may be waived, but only if a trial court informs the juvenile of his rights and confirms the juvenile understands the significance of the waiver. Lunn v. State, 675 So.2d 648 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). The instant record does not demonstrate B.B. knowingly waived his right to a PDR. Therefore, we vacate B.B.'s commitment and remand for the trial court to consider a PDR before recommitting B.B., or to secure B.B.'s knowing waiver of that right. We find no error in the second point raised by B.B.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

POLEN, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Opinion text: CourtListener, Free Law Project. Not an official reporter; check the court's version before citing.