General provisions for hearingsRule 8.255
Related statutes: § 39.013 Procedures and jurisdiction; right to counsel; guardian ad litem. · § 39.01 · § 39.0136 · § 39.0132
33 opinions cite Rule 8.255
-
B.D. v. Department of Children & Families 3D2024-2252 · 3rd DCA 2025
Prohibition granted; the judge's private discussion of the case's merits with the guardian ad litem supervisor and case manager, without the mother or counsel, required disqualification.
…to address the trial court regarding a personal matter. The trial court thought it would be best if it spoke with the minor child in private. See Fla. R. Juv. P. 8.255(c). B.D. agreed to the one-on-one conversation, but requested that any in camera discussion be transcribed. No one objected to the request. The…
-
A.M. v. D.S. 1D19-1855 · 1st DCA 2021
Termination and permanent guardianship reversed because a Chapter 63 adoption-related case was decided under Chapter 39 without notice, violating the father's due process.
…in family law proceedings (including adoption) without a prior court order based on good cause. The trial court did this rather than cite Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.255(d), which sets out a process for examination of minors in camera in chapter 39 TPR proceedings. Four days before that trial was to commence, A.M.’s…
-
WS v. Department of Children & Families 31 So. 3d 329 · 4D09-4625 · 4th DCA 2010
· cited by 2 in all courts
Termination affirmed: the child was properly excused from trial for his mental health, incarceration was not the sole basis, and there is no jury right.
…for him to see his father, who had damaged him, and it could cause regression. Based upon this evidence the court denied the motion. Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.255(b) provides “the child has a right to be present at the hearing unless the court finds that the child’s mental or physical condition or age is such that a court…
-
In re G.S. 989 So. 2d 1282 · 2D07-3938 · 2nd DCA 2008
Dependency order reversed because the seven-year-old's competency inquiry was inadequate; on remand, limits on how she testifies need an evidentiary basis.
…that the child "be examined in camera via closed circuit equipment and interviewed by a trained forensic examiner." The court cited to Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.255(d)(2) which provides for the in camera examination of a child. Rule 8.255(d)(2) requires the court, after motion and hearing, to make specific written findings of…
-
L.S. v. Department of Children & Family Services 989 So. 2d 1282 · 2D07-3938-2 · 2nd DCA 2008
· cited by 2 in all courts
Dependency order reversed because the seven-year-old's competency inquiry was inadequate; on remand, limits on how she testifies need an evidentiary basis.
…that the child “be examined in camera via closed circuit equipment and interviewed by a trained forensic examiner.” The court cited to Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.255(d)(2) which provides for the in camera examination of a child. Rule 8.255(d)(2) requires the court, after motion and hearing, to make specific written findings of…
-
A.G. v. Department of Children & Families 193 So. 3d 1097 · 4D16-782 · 4th DCA 2016
· cited by 1 in all courts
Adjudication, disposition and case plan reversed because of improper in camera testimony, inadequate child competency inquiry, and child hearsay admitted without a reliability hearing.
…restrictions on the method of examining a child witness without holding an evidentiary hearing and making factual findings supported by the evidence. Fla. R. Juv. P. 8.255(d); In re G.S., 989 So. 2d 1282, 1285 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008). Here, the Department alleged the child would “suffer emotional or mental harm if required to testify in…
-
C.K. v. Department of Children & Family Services 88 So. 3d 975 · 2D12-633 · 2nd DCA 2012
· cited by 8 in all courts
No-contact order reversed because the father got no notice or chance to be heard at the dependency drug court hearing that issued it.
…2011). Section 39.502(1) and (4)-(9), Florida Statutes (2011), requires that parties in dependency proceedings receive notice. Similarly, Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.255(h), applicable to dependency proceedings, provides that “[w]hen these rules do not require a specific notice, all parties will be given reasonable notice of any…
-
T.W. v. Department of Children & Families 975 So. 2d 630 · 4D07-4781 · 4th DCA 2008
· cited by 1 in all courts
Termination affirmed for the mother's long drug addiction and case plan failure; refusing two children's live testimony was harmless given their accepted proffer.
… The mother also objects to the trial court's refusing to allow two of her four children to testify without making findings pursuant to Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.255(d)(2)(C). That provision, however, applies only where an in-camera examination has occurred. The trial court refused to permit two children from testifying, because…
-
L.R. v. J.F. 960 So. 2d 836 · 4D06-4003 · 4th DCA 2007
Custody order reversed because the mother had a right to appointed counsel in the retained dependency case and the child should have testified.
…court erred in excluding T.F. *840 from the hearing and not speaking to her regarding her desire to remain with the mother in Florida. Juvenile Procedure Rule 8.255 supports the mother's position. Subsection (b) of the rule makes clear that a child has a right to be present in juvenile matters "unless the court finds that…
-
L.R. v. J.F. 960 So. 2d 836 · 4D4B06-4003 · 4th DCA 2007
· cited by 1 in all courts
Custody order reversed because the mother had a right to appointed counsel in the retained dependency case and the child should have testified.
…court erred in excluding T.F. *840 from the hearing and not Speaking to her regarding her desire to remain with the mother in Florida. Juvenile Procedure Rule 8.255 supports the mother’s position. Subsection (b) of the rule makes clear that a child has a right to be present in juvenile matters “unless the court finds that…
-
G.C. v. Department of Children & Families 791 So. 2d 17 · 5D99-2227 · 5th DCA 2001
· cited by 21 in all courts
Dependency affirmed as to the father's sexual abuse but reversed on the mother's mental abuse; child testifying outside parents' presence and denied postponement upheld.
…abused H.C. EXCLUSION OF THE PARENTS FROM THE HEARING AT WHICH H.C. TESTIFIED Section 39.408(c)(2), Florida Statutes (1997) and Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.255.(c) provide authority for the examination of children outside the presence of their parents. The statute has since been re-codified into section 39.507(2),…
-
Department of Children & Families v. J.J. 5D23-0655 · 5th DCA 2023
Denial of dependency reversed: judge refused to weigh child witnesses' credibility, required actual harm, and appeared partial; new hearing before a different judge.
…the GAL argue that the trial court erred in refusing to assess the credibility of A.H. and C.J. while conducting the in-camera examination. Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.255(d)(2)(A) provides that “[o]n motion and hearing, the child may be examined by the court outside the presence of other parties as provided by law. The court shall…
-
K.M. v. Department of Children & Families 201 So. 3d 1242 · 2D16-3197 · 2nd DCA 2016
· cited by 1 in all courts
Order terminating supervision and jurisdiction reversed on DCF's concession because the out-of-state father received no notice the motion would be heard.
…"[s]ection 39.502(1) and (4)-(9), Florida Statutes (2011), requires that parties in dependency proceedings receive notice. Similarly, Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.255(h), applicable to dependency proceedings, provides that '[w]hen these rules do not require a specific notice, all parties will be given reasonable notice of any…
-
W.T. v. K.F.Y. 59 So. 3d 1216 · 5D10-4031 · 5th DCA 2011
· cited by 1 in all courts
… Further, there is neither a transcript, nor an adequate substitute, memorializing the proceedings before the trial court as required by Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.255(g). See J.D.L. v. W.J.J., Jr., 54 So.3d 603 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011). Accordingly, we reverse the final judgment and remand to the trial court to conduct a new…
-
D.F. v. Department of Children & Family Services 877 So. 2d 733 · 3D03-1478 · 3rd DCA 2004
· cited by 1 in all courts
Termination reversed because denying continuances once the incarcerated mother was located, and allowing only brief counsel contact, denied her a meaningful opportunity to respond.
…289 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). It is- quite common, however, to grant a continuance before or during a hearing for good cause shown by any party. See e.g. Fla. R. Juv. P. 8.255(f). The trial court had a number of options at its disposal to ensure that D.F.’s due process rights w;ere not violated. The trial court could have allowed…
-
N.W. v. Department of Children & Families 865 So. 2d 625 · 4D03-1351 · 4th DCA 2004
· cited by 3 in all courts
Termination affirmed; judicial notice of prior court orders was proper, and the lack of findings on denying a child's testimony was abandoned.
…court erred in failing to make specific findings as to why it denied the mother’s motion to allow A.S. to testify at the final hearing, see Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.255(d)(2)(C)(stating that the court shall make specific findings of fact, on the record, as to the basis for its ruling whether to allow a child witness to testify), this…
-
S.B. v. Department of Children & Families 851 So. 2d 689 · SC02-2262 · Florida Supreme Court 2003
· cited by 32 in all courts
Supreme Court held a parent in a dependency case without termination or criminal charges has no right to collaterally challenge appointed counsel's effectiveness.
…provide for the active participation of the judge, no jury, and the appointment of a guardian ad litem on direct behalf of the child. See, e.g., Fla. R. Juv. P. 8.255(d) (permitting the court to call a child to testify at a dependency hearing); Fla. R. Juv. P. 8.330(a) (providing that an adjudicatory hearing in dependency…
-
Adoption Centre, Inc. v. Marshall 627 So. 2d 589 · DCA93-1199 · District Court of Appeal 1993
…petition for dependency and petition for termination of parental rights. See In re Interest of T.J., 466 So.2d 17, 17-18 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Fla. R.Juv.P. 8.255(e); § 39.465, Fla.Stat. (1991). The order is reversed and this matter is remanded with instructions to schedule a hearing with adequate notice to each party so…
-
Amendments to Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure 827 So. 2d 219 · SC02-117 · Florida Supreme Court 2002
· cited by 1 in all courts
…unanimously. The Committee has proposed amendments to Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure 8.030, 8.031, 8.085, 8.110, 8.185, 8.201, 8.210, 8.225, 8.245, 8.255, 8.265, 8.275, 8.345, 8.525, and 8.635, and Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure Forms 8.959, 8.960, 8.967, and 8.979. Further, the Committee has proposed new…
-
In re Amendments to Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.255 3 So. 3d 1239 · SC08-1236 · Florida Supreme Court 2009
· cited by 1 in all courts
…§ 2(a), Fla. Const. The Steering Committee on Families and Children in the Court (Steering Committee) has filed a petition seeking to amend Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.255, General Provisions for Hearing. The petition was filed in conjunction with the Steering Committee's Report containing administrative recommendations in…
-
In re Amendments to Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.255 88 So. 3d 142 · SC10-2010 · Florida Supreme Court 2012
PER CURIAM. This matter is before the Court for consideration of proposed amendments to Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.255. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.; Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.140(e). On October 21, 2010, the Florida Bar’s Juvenile Rules Committee…
-
In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure - 2018 Regular-Cycle Report 258 So. 3d 1254 · SC18-174 · Florida Supreme Court 2018
…for comment after they were filed. The Civil Procedure Rules Committee (CivPR Committee) filed a comment with the Court raising concerns about proposed new rule 8.255(e) (Taking Testimony), which addresses the use of communication equipment, suggesting that the JCR Committee should coordinate its proposal with amendments to…
-
In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure 725 So. 2d 296 · SC93-3 · Florida Supreme Court 1998
· cited by 1 in all courts
…references to the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (“HRS”), which was abolished several years ago. See, for example, the amended versions of rules 8.255(a) and 8.305(d). Similarly, the Committee proposes striking outdated language regarding treatment plans, disposition hearings, and the representation of HRS by…
-
In re Amendments to Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure - 2023 Legislation SC2023-1371 · Florida Supreme Court 2023
… -2- well as the factors a court must consider in determining good cause to excuse providing a primary e-mail address. Relatedly, rules 8.224, 8.225, and 8.255 are amended to reflect that a party may consent to service by e-mail if the primary e-mail address is provided to the clerk, and rule 8.224 is amended to…
-
Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure 894 So. 2d 875 · SC04-97 · Florida Supreme Court 2005
· cited by 1 in all courts
…to Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure, 827 So.2d 219, 220 (Fla.2002) (“Amendments ”). In Amendments, the Rules Committee proposed an amendment to rule 8.255, General Provisions for Hearings, that would prohibit general and special masters from conducting specific dependency hearings — namely, shelter hearings,…
-
In re Amendments to Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure, Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure, and Florida Supreme Court Approved Family Law Forms SC22-1 · Florida Supreme Court 2022
…8.255 (General Provisions for Hearings) provide for the remote and hybrid conduct of certain delinquency and dependency hearings. Under amended rules 8.100 and 8.255, -4- evidentiary proceedings must be conducted in person unless the parties agree, or the court orders for good cause…
-
In re Amendments to the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure—2017 Regular-Cycle Report 227 So. 3d 115 · SC17-91 · Florida Supreme Court 2017
· cited by 2 in all courts
…consequences of (1) prohibiting children from entering a courthouse building, and (2) directly conflicting with certain provisions of Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.255, especially in the context of Unified Family Court proceedings, we decline to adopt them. Additionally, we refer these issues back to the Family Law Rules…
-
In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure 123 So. 3d 1128 · SC13-1354 · Florida Supreme Court 2013
· cited by 1 in all courts
…or commitment order error. (A) This motion stays rendition under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.020(hXi). (B) [No Change] (2) [No Change] RULE 8.255. GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR HEARINGS (a)-(h) [No Change] (i) Advising Parents. At any hearing when it has been determined that reunification is not a viable…
-
In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure 5 So. 3d 665 · SC08-1612-2 · Florida Supreme Court 2009
…the proposed amendment to use the term "relative caregiver,” rather than "relative caretaker.” Similarly, on our own motion, we amend the third sentence of rule 8.255(c) to replace the term "relative caretaker” with the term "relative caregiver.”
-
Amendments to the Rules of Juvenile Procedure (8.330 & 8.525) 789 So. 2d 951 · SC00-1469 · Florida Supreme Court 2000
Supreme Court adopts juvenile rule amendments letting parties, such as out-of-state incarcerated parents, appear at dependency and termination adjudicatory hearings by audio or audiovisual device.
…of parental rights. (e) Examination of Child. The court may hear the testimony of the child outside the physical presence of the parties as provided by rule 8.255. Counsel for the parties shall be present during all examinations. The court may limit the manner in which counsel examine the child. (f) Previous Testimony…
-
Amendments to the Rules of Juvenile Procedure 783 So. 2d 138 · SC00-644 · Florida Supreme Court 2000
· cited by 8 in all courts
…by law. Committee Notes 1991 Amendment. This rule allows any party to request an evaluation but provides a mechanism for a hearing to quash the request. RULE 8.255. GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR HEARINGS (a) Presence of Counsel. The department must be represented by an attorney at every stage of these proceedings. (b)…
-
Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure 684 So. 2d 756 · SC87656 · Florida Supreme Court 1996
· cited by 1 in all courts
…or as provided by law. (de) Examination of Child. The court may hear the testimony of the child outside the physical presence of the parties as provided by rule 8.255. Counsel for the parties shall be present during all examinations. The court may limit the manner in which counsel examine the child. (f) Previous Testimony…
-
In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure 608 So. 2d 478 · SC79591 · Florida Supreme Court 1992
· cited by 8 in all courts
…to move for dismissal based on the grounds that there are no material facts in dispute and that these facts are not legally sufficient to prove dependency. RULE 8.255. GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR HEARINGS (a) Presence of Counsel. The Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services must be represented by an attorney at every…
No opinion cites this provision by number.
Cited as rule 8.255 under earlier numbering (1)
These opinions cite a rule numbered 8.255 before that number meant this rule: before the rules were renumbered on July 1, 1991. They are about a different rule.
0 admin code rules cite Rule 8.255
DCF's rules in Chapter 65C, Florida Administrative Code, that cite it.
No admin code rule cites Rule 8.255.
0 CFOPs cite Rule 8.255
How DCF carries it out. A page opens in the CFOP reader with the citation highlighted.
No CFOP cites Rule 8.255.
Shading shows how often opinions cite each provision: rarely sometimes often most. Click a provision to list the opinions citing it.
(a) Presence of Counsel. The department must be represented by an attorney at every stage of these proceedings.
(b) Presence of Child.
(1) The child has a right to be present at all hearings.
(2) If the child is present at the hearing, the court may excuse the child from any portion of the hearing when the court determines that it would not be in the child’s best interest to remain.
(3) If a child is not present at a hearing, the court must inquire and determine the reason for the absence of the child. The court must determine whether it is in the best interest of the child to conduct the hearing without the presence of the child or to continue the hearing to provide the child an opportunity to be present at the hearing.
(4) Any party may file a motion to require or excuse the presence of the child.
(c) Separate Examinations. The child and the parents, caregivers, or legal custodians of the child may be examined separately and apart from each other.
(d) Examination of Child; Special Protections.
(1) Testimony by Child. A child may be called to testify in open court by any party to the proceeding or the court, and may be examined or cross-examined.
(2) In-Camera Examination.
(A) On motion and hearing, the child may be examined by the court outside the presence of other parties as provided by law. The court must assure that proceedings are recorded, unless otherwise stipulated by the parties.
(B) The motion may be filed by any party or the trial court on its own motion.
(C) The court shall make specific written findings of fact, on the record, as to the basis for its ruling. These findings may include but are not limited to:
(i) the age of the child;
(ii) the nature of the allegation;
(iii) the relationship between the child and the alleged abuser or the relationship of the child to the parties in the case;
(iv) the likelihood that the child would suffer emotional or mental harm if required to testify in open court;
(v) whether the child’s testimony is more likely to be truthful if given outside the presence of other parties;
(vi) whether cross-examination would adversely affect the child; and
(vii) the manifest best interest of the child.
(D) The child may be called to testify by means of closed-circuit television or by videotaping as provided by law.
(e) Conducting Hearings. Except as otherwise provided in these rules, proceedings must be conducted as follows.
(1) Evidentiary proceedings must be conducted in person unless the parties agree that a proceeding should be conducted remotely or conducted in a hybrid format, or the court orders it upon good cause shown.
(2) All other proceedings may be conducted remotely or in a hybrid format upon agreement of the parties or by court order unless good cause is otherwise shown.
(3) The court may consider the following factors in determining whether good cause exists:
(A) the consent of the parties;
(B) the time-sensitivity of the matter;
(C) the nature of the relief sought;
(D) the resources of the parties and the court;
(E) the anticipated duration of the testimony;
(F) the need and ability to review and identify documents during testimony;
(G) the probative value of the testimony;
(H) the geographic location of the witnesses;
(I) the cost and inconvenience in requiring the physical presence of the witnesses;
(J) the need for confrontation of the witnesses;
(K) the need to observe the demeanor of the witnesses;
(L) the potential for unfair surprise; and
(M) any other matter relevant to the request.
(4) A party who participates in a hearing conducted remotely or conducted in a hybrid format must be given the opportunity to privately and confidentially communicate with counsel during the proceedings.
(f) Taking Testimony.
(1) Testimony at a Hearing or Trial. When testifying at a hearing or trial, a witness must be physically present unless otherwise provided by law or these rules. This rule does not apply to statutory requirements for parents to appear at arraignment hearings, advisory hearings, and adjudicatory hearings.
(2) Communication Technology. The court may permit a witness to testify at a hearing or trial by communication technology:
(A) when the proceeding is conducted remotely or conducted in a hybrid fashion as permitted by this rule;
(B) by agreement of the parties; or
(C) for good cause shown upon written or oral request of a party. The request must contain an estimate of the length of the proposed testimony. In considering sufficient good cause, the court may weigh and address in its order or its ruling on the record the reasons stated for testimony by communication technology against the potential for prejudice to the objecting party.
(3) Oath. Testimony may be taken through audio communication technology only if a notary public or other person authorized to administer oaths in the witness’s jurisdiction is physically present with the witness and administers the oath consistent with the laws of the jurisdiction. If testimony is provided at the hearing via audio-video communication technology, the witness may also be sworn remotely using such audio-video communication technology by a person who is qualified and administers the oath consistent with the laws of the witness’s jurisdiction or Florida. The oath procedures of this subdivision are not required for hearings where, by law, the court may consider any evidence to the extent of its probative value even though not competent in an adjudicatory hearing and where the parties and the court agree to waive these oath procedures.
(g) Invoking the Rule. Before the examination of any witness the court may, and on the request of any party must, exclude all other witnesses. The court may cause witnesses to be kept separate and to be prevented from communicating with each other until all are examined.
(h) Continuances. As permitted by law, the court may grant a continuance before or during a hearing for good cause shown by any party.
(i) Record. A record of the testimony in all hearings must be made by an official court reporter, a court-approved stenographer, or a recording device. The records of testimony must be preserved as required by law. Official records of testimony must be transcribed only on order of the court.
(j) Notice. When these rules do not require a specific notice, all parties will be given reasonable notice of any hearing. A party may consent to notice by e-mail by providing a primary e-mail address to the clerk.
(k) Written Notice. The court must provide written notice of the right to participate in a private adoption plan, under chapter 63, Florida Statutes, when required by law.
Amendments since the 1991 renumbering
From the Florida Bar edition's table of amending opinions. Where it lists a range of rules ("8.400–8.410"), each rule in the range today is listed.
- Eff. 2019-01-01 Amended · 258 So.3d 1254
- Eff. 2013-10-03 Amended · 123 So.3d 1128
- Eff. 2012-06-01 Amended · 88 So.3d 142
- Eff. 2005-01-27 Amended · 894 So.2d 875
- Eff. 2003-01-01 Amended · 827 So.2d 219
- Eff. 2001-01-01 Amended · 783 So.2d 138
- Eff. 1998-10-01 Amended · 725 So.2d 296
- Eff. 1991-07-01 Amended · 589 So.2d 818
Committee notes (3)
1991 Amendment. (b) This change allows a child to be present instead of mandating the child’s presence when the child’s presence would not be in his or her best interest. The court is given the discretion to determine the need for the child to be present.
1992 Amendment. This change was made to reflect a moderated standard for in-camera examination of a child less rigid than the criminal law standard adopted by the committee in the 1991 rule revisions.
2005 Amendment. Subdivision (i) was deleted because provisions for general masters were transferred to rule 8.257.