Dependency Law Finder

Florida's dependency statutes, court rules and DCF operating procedures, with the appellate opinions that apply them

data.robertlathamesq.org · All tools

Before you use this site

This site aggregates legal authorities from a variety of public sources. It is AI and human reviewed. Text processing errors can occur. Always check the information here against the official linked source.

This site is publicly available. Use for general research only. Do not submit confidential or identifiable case information.

I don't agree: show the official sources

N.W. v. Department of Children & Families865 So. 2d 625 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) · 4D03-1351

Court
4th DCA
Decided
2004-01-28
Case
TPR
Appellant
Mother

Affirmed Termination affirmed; judicial notice of prior court orders was proper, and the lack of findings on denying a child's testimony was abandoned.

Issues
TPR ground: continuing involvement threatens the child, TPR ground: egregious conduct, Evidence: records, judicial notice & prior proceedings, Preservation & fundamental error

Summary, issues, facts, outcome, and appellant were extracted automatically from the opinion. Check the opinion itself before relying on them.

On CourtListener
PER CURIAM.

N.W., the mother, appeals the final order of the circuit court terminating her parental rights to two children, A.S. and C.S., pursuant to section 39.806(1)(c), (f), Florida Statutes (2002).1 We find that the trial court’s order of termination is supported by competent substantial evidence in the record. See Padgett v. Dep’t of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., 577 So.2d 565, 571 (Fla.1991)(“[B]ecause parental *626rights constitute a fundamental liberty interest, the state must establish in each case that termination of those rights is the least restrictive means of protecting the child from serious harm.”).

While it appears that the trial court erred in failing to make specific findings as to why it denied the mother’s motion to allow A.S. to testify at the final hearing, see Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.255(d)(2)(C)(stating that the court shall make specific findings of fact, on the record, as to the basis for its ruling whether to allow a child witness to testify), this issue was not raised in the initial brief and is therefore abandoned. See J.A.B. Enters. v. Gibbons, 596 So.2d 1247 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). Additionally, we find that it was proper for the trial court to take judicial notice of the prior court orders, including the dependency order, the orders from the periodic review hearings, and the order terminating the parental rights of the father. See § 90.202, Fla. Stat. (2002).

A court record is not subject to dispute: either it is or it is not a record of a court. When it is shown to the satisfaction of the trial judge that a document is a record of a court, then the judge should judicially notice it.

CHARLES W. EHRHARDT, FLORIDA EVIDENCE § 202.6, at 59-60 (2008 ed.).

We have reviewed the other issues raised on appeal and find no error. Accordingly, the order of termination of parental rights is AFFIRMED.

WARNER, POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

. Section 39.806(1)(c) allows for termination of parental rights where the parent has engaged in conduct that demonstrates that the parent’s continuing involvement in the parent-child relationship would threaten the life, safety, well-being, or physical, mental or emotional health of the child irrespective of the provision of services; section 39.806(1)(f) allows for termination where the parent has engaged in egregious conduct or acts as defined in the statute.

Opinion text: CourtListener, Free Law Project. Not an official reporter; check the court's version before citing.