Dependency Law Finder

Florida's dependency statutes, court rules and DCF operating procedures, with the appellate opinions that apply them

data.robertlathamesq.org · All tools

Before you use this site

This site aggregates legal authorities from a variety of public sources. It is AI and human reviewed. Text processing errors can occur. Always check the information here against the official linked source.

This site is publicly available. Use for general research only. Do not submit confidential or identifiable case information.

I don't agree: show the official sources

O'Connor v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services680 So. 2d 1137 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996) · DCA95-683

Court
District Court of Appeal
Decided
1996-10-16
On CourtListener
SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

In claiming the guardian ad litem had no authority to prosecute the present action to terminate her parental rights, O’Connor contends that the amendments to sections 61.401 and 61.403, Florida Statutes (1993), Ch. 94-204, §§ 3, 5, at 1173, 1174, Laws of Fla., which became effective prior to the trial, in effect overruled our decision to the contrary in Simms v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., 641 So.2d 957 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994), review denied, 649 So.2d 870 (Fla.1994). Because those amendments govern only actions “for dissolution of marriage, modification, parental responsibility, custody, or visitation,” see § 61.401, Fla. Stat. (Supp.1994), and thus do not affect proceedings like this under Chapter 39, we reject this contention.1

*1138We likewise find no merit in the claim of error as to the merits of the decision below,

Affirmed.

. The suggestion otherwise in Simms, 641 So.2d at 963 n. 4 (Schwartz, C.J., dissenting in part), does not withstand analysis.

Opinion text: CourtListener, Free Law Project. Not an official reporter; check the court's version before citing.