Dependency Law Finder

Florida's dependency statutes, court rules and DCF operating procedures, with the appellate opinions that apply them

data.robertlathamesq.org · All tools

Before you use this site

This site aggregates legal authorities from a variety of public sources. It is AI and human reviewed. Text processing errors can occur. Always check the information here against the official linked source.

This site is publicly available. Use for general research only. Do not submit confidential or identifiable case information.

I don't agree: show the official sources

In the Interest of C.D. v. State624 So. 2d 867 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993) · DCA93-680

Court
District Court of Appeal
Decided
1993-10-12
On CourtListener
PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to a petition for delinquency, C.D. was charged with unlawful escape from Duval House, a halfway house, as defined in section 39.01(25), Florida Statutes (1989). The issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion to dismiss the escape charge. We reverse.

*868In D.P. v. State, 597 So.2d 952 (Fla. 1st DCA1992), this court held unconstitutional and invalid that portion of section 39.061, Florida Statutes, pertaining to escape from residential commitment facilities. Thereafter, in R.A.H. v. State, 614 So.2d 1189 (Fla. 1st DCA1993), the court ruled there was no basis in law for treating the decision in D.P. as having the legal effect of reviving the former repealed statute. The state acknowledges that the ruling in R.A.H. decides the issue in this case.

Accordingly, based upon the state’s concession of error, and this court’s decision in R.A.H., C.D.’s determination of guilt of escape is reversed, and this cause is remanded with directions to dismiss the escape charge.

ERVIN, JOANOS and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Opinion text: CourtListener, Free Law Project. Not an official reporter; check the court's version before citing.