Dependency Law Finder

Florida's dependency statutes, court rules and DCF operating procedures, with the appellate opinions that apply them

data.robertlathamesq.org · All tools

Before you use this site

This site aggregates legal authorities from a variety of public sources. It is AI and human reviewed. Text processing errors can occur. Always check the information here against the official linked source.

This site is publicly available. Use for general research only. Do not submit confidential or identifiable case information.

I don't agree: show the official sources

Gammage v. State655 So. 2d 183 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995) · DCA93-3705

Court
District Court of Appeal
Decided
1995-05-17
Law cited
§ 39.059(7)
On CourtListener

ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

We grant appellant’s motion for clarification and substitute the following opinion for our opinion filed March 29, 1995.

We affirm appellant’s conviction of strong-arm robbery, but reverse his adult sentence because the trial court did not consider the factors set forth in section 39.059(7), Florida Statutes (1993), and failed to make any findings in regard to those factors — both of which are necessary when sentencing a juvenile as an adult. Troutman v. State, 630 So.2d 528 (Fla.1993).

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

DELL, C.J., and WARNER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Opinion text: CourtListener, Free Law Project. Not an official reporter; check the court's version before citing.