Dependency Law Finder

Florida's dependency statutes, court rules and DCF operating procedures, with the appellate opinions that apply them

data.robertlathamesq.org · All tools

Before you use this site

This site aggregates legal authorities from a variety of public sources. It is AI and human reviewed. Text processing errors can occur. Always check the information here against the official linked source.

This site is publicly available. Use for general research only. Do not submit confidential or identifiable case information.

I don't agree: show the official sources

Siegle v. State625 So. 2d 955 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993) · DCA92-03223

Court
District Court of Appeal
Decided
1993-10-20
On CourtListener
PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions for sale and possession of a hallucinogenic substance. However, we find that the trial court erred in imposing adult sanctions without first making the findings required by section 39.059(7)(c), Florida Statutes (1991). This is so even though appellant’s sentence, two years’ Youthful Offender community control, was the result of a plea agreement. Sirmons v. State, 620 So.2d 1249 (Fla.1993); Thomas v. State, 623 So.2d 1238 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). After remand the trial court may reimpose the adult sanction provided the statutory findings are made.

Reversed and remanded for resentencing.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Opinion text: CourtListener, Free Law Project. Not an official reporter; check the court's version before citing.