Appellant was convicted and sentenced for armed robbery. On appeal he claims several errors with respect to the sentencing procedures followed by the trial court. We find no reversible error as to the claim that the trial judge penalized the appellant because of appellant’s exercise of his right to demand a jury trial. Yesbick v. State, 408 So.2d 1083 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). However, we agree with the appellant that the trial court was required to make written findings pursuant to the provisions of section 39.111(6)(d), Florida Statutes (1981). Jones v. State, 418 So.2d 1256 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). In addition, upon remand, the trial court should enter a written order justifying the retention of jurisdiction pursuant to the provisions of section 947.-16(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1981).
Ross v. State426 So. 2d 1228 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983) · DCA82-1306
- Decided
- 1983-02-09
- Law cited
- § 39.111(6)(d)
Opinion text: CourtListener, Free Law Project. Not an official reporter; check the court's version before citing.
Cited by 1 opinion
In this collection (1)
From CourtListener's citation data, every court it covers, which can miss citations (in short or unpublished orders especially).
Cites 1 opinion in this collection
Citations to cases outside the collection are linked in the opinion text itself.