The trial court’s order adjudicating the minor child dependent as to the father is affirmed. The court found that the father had neglected the child through domestic violence. The father has not provided that portion of the trial transcript at which the issue of domestic violence was litigated. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979). He contends nevertheless that the order itself shows that the court erred. According to the order, several incidences of domestic violence between the mother and father occurred in the presence of the child, which can constitute evidence of neglect. See C.J. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 968 So.2d 121, 123-24 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007).
J.F. v. Department of Children & Families64 So. 3d 199 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) · 4D11-249
- Court
- 4th DCA
- Decided
- 2011-07-06
Opinion text: CourtListener, Free Law Project. Not an official reporter; check the court's version before citing.
Not cited
No opinion in CourtListener's collection cites this case.
Cites 1 opinion in this collection
Citations to cases outside the collection are linked in the opinion text itself.
- C.J. v. Department of Children & Families 4D07-1496 · 4th DCA 2007Dependency adjudication reversed for a new hearing because the court admitted hearsay under a blanket ruling, though the remaining evidence could support neglect.