Affirmed. See S.A. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 961 So.2d 1066 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); N.S. v. Dep’t of Children and Families, 36 So.3d 776 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).
K.Q. v. Department of Children & Families114 So. 3d 411 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) · 3D13-587
- Court
- 3rd DCA
- Decided
- 2013-05-29
Opinion text: CourtListener, Free Law Project. Not an official reporter; check the court's version before citing.
Not cited
No opinion in CourtListener's collection cites this case.
Cites 2 opinions in this collection
Citations to cases outside the collection are linked in the opinion text itself.
- N.S. v. Department of Children & Families 3D09-2019 · 3rd DCA 2010Termination affirmed: the father ignored his case plan, and the mother's intellectual limits meant she could never safely parent despite services; partial dissent.
- S.A. v. Department of Children & Family Services 3D07-597 · 3rd DCA 2007Adjudication affirmed; letting the officer testify by phone over objection was harmless error, and the unlisted psychologist issue was cured by an interview.