Based on the facts of this case, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying R.E.P.’s motion for continuance. See L.M. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 946 So.2d 42 (Fla. 4th
Affirmed.
R.E.P. v. Department of Children & Family Services961 So. 2d 989 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) · 3D06-2877
- Court
- 3rd DCA
- Decided
- 2007-06-27
Opinion text: CourtListener, Free Law Project. Not an official reporter; check the court's version before citing.
Not cited
No opinion in CourtListener's collection cites this case.
Cites 1 opinion in this collection
Citations to cases outside the collection are linked in the opinion text itself.
- L.M. v. Department of Children & Families 4D06-1968 · 4th DCA 2006Dependency affirmed on evidence of the mother's mental illness, drugs, and squalid home; trial without the incompetent mother was allowed to protect the children's permanency.