Dependency Law Finder

Florida's dependency statutes, court rules and DCF operating procedures, with the appellate opinions that apply them

data.robertlathamesq.org · All tools

Before you use this site

This site aggregates legal authorities from a variety of public sources. It is AI and human reviewed. Text processing errors can occur. Always check the information here against the official linked source.

This site is publicly available. Use for general research only. Do not submit confidential or identifiable case information.

I don't agree: show the official sources

P.D.W. v. State621 So. 2d 739 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993) · 2D91-03695

Court
2nd DCA
Decided
1993-06-23
On CourtListener
621 So.2d 739 (1993)

P.D.W., a Minor, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 91-03695.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 23, 1993.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Stephen Krosschell, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Brenda S. Taylor, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PATTERSON, Judge.

In this juvenile proceeding, the trial court failed to follow the proper procedure pursuant to section 39.052(3)(e)(1), Florida Statutes (1991), for adjudicating the appellant as having committed a delinquent act and committing him to the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS). Strict compliance with the provisions of section 39.052(3)(e) is mandatory and failure to comply constitutes reversible error. See R.G.S. v. State, 597 So.2d 816 (Fla. 2d DCA) (interpreting former section 39.09(3)(e), Florida Statutes (1989)), review denied, 601 So.2d 553 (Fla. 1992). Here, neither the written order of commitment nor the transcript of the hearing revealed the specific reasons for the trial court's decision to adjudicate and commit the appellant to HRS. Therefore, we reverse the appellant's adjudication and commitment to HRS and remand the case for a new disposition hearing. Based on the resolution of this issue, we do not reach the appellant's other arguments.

Reversed and remanded.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and LEHAN, J., concur.

Opinion text: CourtListener, Free Law Project. Not an official reporter; check the court's version before citing.