Dependency Law Finder

Florida's dependency statutes, court rules and DCF operating procedures, with the appellate opinions that apply them

data.robertlathamesq.org · All tools

Before you use this site

This site aggregates legal authorities from a variety of public sources. It is AI and human reviewed. Text processing errors can occur. Always check the information here against the official linked source.

This site is publicly available. Use for general research only. Do not submit confidential or identifiable case information.

I don't agree: show the official sources

Law v. State825 So. 2d 474 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) · 2D02-1111

Court
2nd DCA
Decided
2002-08-09
On CourtListener
BLUE, Chief Judge.

Toby Law appeals the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion. Law contended in his motion that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to argue to the trial court that he should have been sentenced as a juvenile and for failing to object when the trial court did not provide written reasons for imposing adult sanctions. Law’s argument is based on his assumption that section 39.059(7)(d), Florida Statutes (1994), applied to his offense.

However, because Law was indicted for a capital offense and entered a plea to an offense punishable by life imprisonment, his sentence was controlled by section 39.022(5)(c)(3), Florida Statutes (1993). This statute required that children who were found guilty of an offense punishable by life imprisonment be sentenced as adults. See Ritchie v. State, 670 So.2d 924 (Fla.1996). Consequently, the trial court reached the correct result, although it erred in its analysis of Law’s claim.

Affirmed.

FULMER and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.

Opinion text: CourtListener, Free Law Project. Not an official reporter; check the court's version before citing.