The appellant challenges an order by which his parental rights were terminated. Because the record reveals that the appellant was not fully informed of his right to counsel at the dependency hearing, we reverse the appealed order. See In the Interest of D.P., 595 So.2d 62 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Belflower v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 578 So.2d 827 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).
R.M. v. Department of Children & Families770 So. 2d 295 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) · 1D99-4709
- Court
- 1st DCA
- Decided
- 2000-11-06
Opinion text: CourtListener, Free Law Project. Not an official reporter; check the court's version before citing.
Not cited
No opinion in CourtListener's collection cites this case.
Cites 2 opinions in this collection
Citations to cases outside the collection are linked in the opinion text itself.