Dependency Law Finder

Florida's dependency statutes, court rules and DCF operating procedures, with the appellate opinions that apply them

data.robertlathamesq.org · All tools

Before you use this site

This site aggregates legal authorities from a variety of public sources. It is AI and human reviewed. Text processing errors can occur. Always check the information here against the official linked source.

This site is publicly available. Use for general research only. Do not submit confidential or identifiable case information.

I don't agree: show the official sources

Citizenship or residency status for immigrant children who are dependents.§ 39.5075

Part V · Petition, Arraignment, Adjudication, and Disposition · 2026 Florida Statutes
Each citation is matched to today's text through the statutes the opinion applied (1997 on), so renumbered subsections land in the right place; those show "Cited as".

12 opinions cite § 39.5075

  1. O.I.C.L. v. Department of Children & Families 205 So. 3d 575 · SC15-1570 · Florida Supreme Court 2016

    Dismissed This opinion cites § 39.5075 18 times: (4), (5), (6), and the section generally

    · cited by 4 in all courts

    Supreme Court dismissed review of a denied dependency petition as moot because the immigrant youth turned 18 and cannot be adjudicated dependent.

    …government, not state courts, to determine whether SIJ status is appropriate). Recognizing that the federal government determines immigration status, section 39.5075(6), Florida Statutes (emphasis added), provides that a Florida court may retain jurisdiction over a dependency case until the age of 22 “solely for the purpose…

  2. In re B.R.C.M. 182 So. 3d 749 · 3D15-0962 · 3rd DCA 2015

    Affirmed This opinion cites § 39.5075 14 times: (4), (5), and the section generally

    · cited by 5 in all courts

    Denial of an immigrant teen's private dependency petition affirmed because dependency law serves children in need, not immigration goals; a dissent urged a hearing.

    …by, the fact that the Legislature has undeniably recognized the importance of assisting undocumented minors who may qualify for SIJS. Florida Statute § 39.5075(4) obligates DCF — or *759 its contracted [community based care provider] — to “petition the court for an order finding that the child meets the criteria for…

  3. In the Interest of: B.R.C.M., A Minor Child v. Department of Children & Families 215 So. 3d 1219 · SC16-179 · Florida Supreme Court 2017

    Reversed & remanded This opinion cites § 39.5075 6 times: (4), and the section generally

    · cited by 3 in all courts

    Supreme Court held a private dependency petition by an immigrant child cannot be summarily denied for seeking immigration status; individualized findings are required.

    …children who have been abused, abandoned, or neglected to obtain lawful permanent residency in the United States” (citing 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(27)(J); § 39.5075, Fla. Stat. (2013)). But the dependency claims regarding such children must be evaluated based on the specific requirements of the dependency statute. And…

  4. In the Interest of Y v. a Minor Child 160 So. 3d 576 · 1D14-5713 · 1st DCA 2015

    Reversed & remanded This opinion cites § 39.5075 3 times: (1)(b), (4), and the section generally

    · cited by 7 in all courts

    Dismissal of a child's dependency petition reversed: abuse abroad can support dependency, an SIJ-status motive does not invalidate it, and no jurisdictional bar was shown.

    …undocumented children who have been abused, abandoned, or neglected to obtain lawful permanent residency in the United States. 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(27)(J); § 39.5075, Fla. Stat. (2013). While these laws may be vulnerable to misuse, the mere acknowledgement in a dependency petition that the petitioner intends to seek…

  5. Morcroft v. Department of Children & Families 929 So. 2d 51 · 5D05-2804 · 5th DCA 2006

    Affirmed This opinion cites § 39.5075 3 times, the section generally

    Dependency against the custodian affirmed: the court had jurisdiction despite the foreign mother not being joined, though DCF must address the child's immigration status.

    …because the minor child, C.J., is an illegal alien. For this reason, Moreroft contends the trial court erred by failing to follow the requirements of section 39.5075, Florida Statutes (2005) (effective July 1, 2005), and the provisions of rule 65C-9.003, Florida Administrative Code. Significantly, in the July 11th hearing,…

  6. W.B.A. v. v. Department of Children & Families 229 So. 3d 850 · 3D16-1448 · 3rd DCA 2016

    Affirmed This opinion cites § 39.5075 2 times, the section generally

    Summary denial of four orphaned immigrant children's dependency petition affirmed under binding precedent; concurrence urges Supreme Court review and dissent would require an evidentiary hearing.

    …of the appellate proceedings),6 but other unaccompanied immigrant cases are pending before that Court.7 3 See 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a) (27)(J). 4 Section 39.5075, Florida Statutes (2016). 5 In re K.B.L.V., 176 So. 3d 297, 300 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (Shepherd, J., specially concurring). 6 O.I.C.L. v. Fla. Dep’t of…

  7. In re F.J.G.M. 196 So. 3d 534 · 3D15-0546 · 3rd DCA 2016

    Affirmed This opinion cites § 39.5075 2 times, the section generally

    · cited by 2 in all courts

    Denial of a private dependency petition sought for immigration status affirmed; the father's abandonment was too remote and the mother cared for the child.

    …denial), together with specific written findings and conclusions, will also allow meaningful appellate review. 6 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(27)(J); see also § 39.5075, Fla. Stat. (2015). 7 This is the time according to the hearing transcript. 16 I have not concluded that…

  8. In re E.P.N. 180 So. 3d 249 · DCA15-0579 · District Court of Appeal 2015

    Affirmed This opinion cites § 39.5075 2 times, the section generally

    Summary denial of an immigrant teen's private dependency petition affirmed per curiam under circuit precedent; a dissent would have remanded for individualized consideration.

    …recommendation for cértifícation to the Supreme Court of Florida set forth in my dissent in In re B.R.C.M. . 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(27)(J); see also § 39.5075, Fla. Stat. (2015). . In re B.R.C.M., No. 3D15-962, 2015 WL 9584743 (Fla. 3d DCA Dec. 30, 2015). . Id. (Salter, J., dissenting). Third…

  9. Department of Children & Families v. S.A.E. 184 So. 3d 615 · 1D15-3624 · 1st DCA 2016

    Reversed This opinion cites § 39.5075 1 time: (1)(b)

    · cited by 1 in all courts

    Dependency adjudication reversed because the father's abandonment twelve years earlier in Honduras posed no present threat; avoiding deportation is not a basis for dependency.

    …for special immigrant juvenile status under federal law” since he resides with his mother and is therefore not eligible for long-term foster care. See § 39.5075(1)(b)2, Fla. Stat. In re S.A.R.D., ___ So. 3d ___, 2016 WL 145999 (Fla. 3d DCA Jan. 13, 2016), and In re Y.V., 160 So. 3d 576 (Fla, 1st DCA 2015) provide excellent…

  10. Interest of S.F.A.C. v. Department of Children & Families 182 So. 3d 745 · 3D15-2120 · 3rd DCA 2015

    Affirmed This opinion cites § 39.5075 1 time, the section generally

    Denial of an immigrant teen's private dependency petition affirmed under controlling circuit precedent; a dissent would have required an evidentiary hearing and individualized findings.

    …SIJ cases such as this one. In my view, H.S.P. correctly concludes that specific written findings as to each parent 38 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(27)(J); see also § 39.5075, Fla. Stat. (2015). 8 and each legal claim are important for the subsequent evaluation of an immigrant juvenile’s…

  11. In the Interest of K.B.L v. a Minor 176 So. 3d 297 · 3D14-2746 · 3rd DCA 2015

    Affirmed This opinion cites § 39.5075 1 time, the section generally

    · cited by 15 in all courts

    Dismissal of an immigrant teen's private dependency petition affirmed because the father's abandonment was remote and the child lived safely with his mother.

    …provide for the care, safety, and protection of children.” Assistance to the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services is not one of them. But see, § 39.5075, Fla. Stat. (2014). 10 FERNANDEZ, J. KB.L.V. appeals the dismissal of his private petition for dependency in…

  12. In re Amendments to Rules of Juvenile Proc. 915 So. 2d 592 · SC05-1303-2 · Florida Supreme Court 2005

    Rule amendment This opinion cites § 39.5075 1 time, the section generally

    · cited by 1 in all courts

    …Fla. Stat.); chapter 2005-179, section 1, Laws of Florida (amending § 39.013(2), Fla. Stat.); chapter 2005-245, section 1, Laws of Florida (amending § 39.5075, Fla. Stat.); chapter 2005-263, sections 1, 4, 6, and 7, Laws of Florida (amending §§ 985.03(46), 985.215(2), 985.231(1), & 985.2311(1)(a), Fla. Stat.). [2]…

2 admin code rules cite § 39.5075

DCF's rules in Chapter 65C, Florida Administrative Code, that cite it or name it as the law they implement.

  1. Rule 65C-30.004 Identification of Children. Implements
  2. Rule 65C-30.007 Case Management Responsibilities After Case Transfer. Implements

1 CFOP cite § 39.5075

How DCF carries it out. A page opens in the CFOP reader with the citation highlighted.

  1. CFOP 170-14 Response to the Human Trafficking of Children p. 1

Shading shows how often opinions cite each provision: rarely sometimes often most. Click a provision to list the opinions citing it.

(1) As used in this section, the term:

(a) “Eligible for long-term foster care” means that reunification with a child’s parent is not an appropriate option for permanency for the child.

(b) “May be eligible for special immigrant juvenile status under federal law” means:

1. The child has been found dependent based on allegations of abuse, neglect, or abandonment;

2. The child is eligible for long-term foster care;

3. It is in the best interest of the child to remain in the United States; and

4. The child remains under the jurisdiction of the juvenile court.

(2) Whenever a child is adjudicated dependent, the department or community-based care provider shall determine whether the child is a citizen of the United States. The department or community-based care provider shall report to the court in its first judicial review concerning the child whether the child is a citizen of the United States and, if not, the steps that have been taken to address the citizenship or residency status of the child. Services to children alleged to have been abused, neglected, or abandoned must be provided without regard to the citizenship of the child except where alienage or immigration status is explicitly set forth as a statutory condition of coverage or eligibility.

(3) If the child is not a citizen, the department or community-based care provider shall include in the case plan developed for the child a recommendation as to whether the permanency plan for the child will include remaining in the United States. If the case plan calls for the child to remain in the United States, and the child is in need of documentation to effectuate this plan, the department or community-based care provider must evaluate the child’s case to determine whether the child may be eligible for special immigrant juvenile status under federal law.

(4) If the child may be eligible for special immigrant juvenile status, the department or community-based care provider shall petition the court for an order finding that the child meets the criteria for special immigrant juvenile status. The ruling of the court on this petition must include findings as to the express wishes of the child, if the child is able to express such wishes, and any other circumstances that would affect whether the best interests of the child would be served by applying for special immigrant juvenile status.

(5) No later than 60 days after an order finding that the child is eligible for special immigrant juvenile status and that applying for this status is in the best interest of the child, the department or community-based care provider shall, directly or through volunteer or contracted legal services, file a petition for special immigrant juvenile status and the application for adjustment of status to the appropriate federal authorities on behalf of the child.

(6) If a petition and application have been filed and the petition and application have not been granted by the time the child reaches 18 years of age, the court may retain jurisdiction over the dependency case solely for the purpose of allowing the continued consideration of the petition and application by federal authorities. Review hearings for the child shall be set solely for the purpose of determining the status of the petition and application. The court’s jurisdiction terminates upon the final decision of the federal authorities. Retention of jurisdiction in this instance does not affect the services available to a young adult under s. 409.1451. The court may not retain jurisdiction of the case after the immigrant child’s 22nd birthday.

(7) In any judicial review report provided to the court for a child for whom the court has granted the order described in subsection (4), the court shall be advised of the status of the petition and application process concerning the child.

(8) The department shall adopt rules to administer this section.

History. s. 1, ch. 2005-245.