Computation and enlargement of timeRule 8.180
7 opinions cite Rule 8.180
-
R.J.A. v. Foster 603 So. 2d 1167 · SC79296 · Florida Supreme Court 1992
· cited by 23 in all courts
…substantive right flowing from the constitutional authority for a separate statutory proceeding. They argue that the ten-day window added in our amendment to rule 8.180, Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure, In re Amendments to Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.180 (Speedy Trial), 536 So.2d 199 (Fla. 1988),…
-
M.T. v. Department of Children & Families 816 So. 2d 227 · 5D01-1302 · 5th DCA 2002
· cited by 2 in all courts
Dismissal of the dependency case reversed because the 30-day adjudicatory hearing deadline in sections 39.506 and 39.507 is directory, not jurisdictional.
…and dismissed the dependency action. That dismissal is the subject of this cross-appeal by DCF. [1] The DCF points out that at one time, Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.180 provided a speedy trial time of 90 days applicable to both dependency and delinquency proceedings. See H.B. v. State, 455 So.2d 1146 (Fla. 1st DCA…
-
D.D. v. Department of Children & Families 849 So. 2d 473 · 4D03-160 · 4th DCA 2003
· cited by 1 in all courts
Dependency adjudication affirmed; the 30-day deadline for the adjudicatory hearing in s. 39.507(1)(a) is directory, not mandatory, so dismissal was not required.
… . The opinion noted that formerly, the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure applied a speedy trial rule to both delinquency and dependency matters, see Fla. R. Juv. P. 8.180 (1984), but due to subsequent amendments a rule governing speedy trial applicable to dependency was eliminated. See Petition of Fla. Bar to Amend Fla.…
-
Gilbert v. K-Mart Corp. 664 So. 2d 335 · 1D93-657 · 1st DCA 1995
· cited by 5 in all courts
… the supreme court addressed the substantive/procedural dilemma in the context of section 39.048, Florida Statutes (1991), in conjunction with its Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.180, in an effort to determine whether section 39.048 granted juveniles an absolute substantive right to be tried within 90 days, thereby overruling the court's…
-
P.S. v. State 658 So. 2d 92 · SC84330 · Florida Supreme Court 1995
…form continuum within which all aspects of speedy trial lie in neat relationship and are to be read as in pari materia ); In re Amendments to Fla.Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.180 (Speedy Trial), 532 So.2d 1272, 1273 (Fla.) ("The rule change proposed by the state attorneys is intended to conform to the procedures for dismissal for…
-
In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, Florida Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, Florida Probate Rules, Florida Rules of Traffic Court, Florida Small Claims Rules, Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, and Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure SC21-1049 · Florida Supreme Court 2021
… - 114 - (3)-(6) [NO CHANGE] (c)-(h) [NO CHANGE] Committee Notes [NO CHANGE] RULE 8.180. COMPUTATION AND ENLARGEMENT OF TIME (a) Computation. Computation of time shall be governed by Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial…
-
Amendments to Rules of Juv. Procedure-Forms 934 So. 2d 438 · SC05-950-2 · Florida Supreme Court 2006
· cited by 2 in all courts
…related to the waiver of parental notification case. Three amendments have been made to rule 8.820. First, subdivision (d)(1) is amended to clarify that rules 8.180 and 8.240, which govern computation of time periods in delinquency and dependency cases, respectively, do not apply to the 48-hour time period for disposition…
No opinion cites this provision by number.
Cited as rule 8.180 under earlier numbering (34)
These opinions cite a rule numbered 8.180 before that number meant this rule: before the rules were renumbered on July 1, 1991. They are about a different rule.
- Interest of V.C.F. v. State DCA90-1404 · District Court of Appeal 1990
- In re J.R. DCA89-2440 · District Court of Appeal 1990
- Interest of R.F.R. v. State DCA89-1621 · District Court of Appeal 1990
- State v. I.A. DCA87-1554 · District Court of Appeal 1988
- State v. I.A. 3D87-1554 · 3rd DCA 1988
- Bell v. State 2D85-734 · 2nd DCA 1985
- Julian v. Lee 5D85-329 · 5th DCA 1985
- Petition of Fla. Bar, Rules of Juv. Proc. SC65103 · Florida Supreme Court 1984
- In the Interest of T.D.B. v. Kirk 5D84-1140 · 5th DCA 1984
- D.A.L. v. State DCA84-133 · District Court of Appeal 1984
- In the Interest of H.B. v. State DCAAW-207 · District Court of Appeal 1984
- T.L. v. Byrd DCA84-440 · District Court of Appeal 1984
- J.J.S. v. State DCAAP-467 · District Court of Appeal 1983
- J.J.S. v. State 1DAP-467 · 1st DCA 1983
- Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Lancione DCA82-964 · District Court of Appeal 1983
- Parr v. State 4D81-567 · 4th DCA 1982
- State v. D.B.C. DCA81-964 · District Court of Appeal 1982
- In the Interest of G.L. v. State DCA81-520 · District Court of Appeal 1982
- State v. D.B.C. 5D81-964 · 5th DCA 1982
- In re B.L.G. DCA81-1072 · District Court of Appeal 1982
- Interest of I.H. v. State DCASS-253 · District Court of Appeal 1981
- I.H. v. State 1DSS-253 · 1st DCA 1981
- State v. Perez 3D80-948 · 3rd DCA 1981
- In re Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure SC57735-2 · Florida Supreme Court 1980
- State v. L.H. DCA80-1196 · District Court of Appeal 1980
- T.L. v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services 5D78-2477/T4-296 · 5th DCA 1980
- State v. L.H. 2D80-1196 · 2nd DCA 1980
- P.L.H. v. Brownlee 5D80-373 · 5th DCA 1980
- Bryan v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services DCA80-71 · District Court of Appeal 1980
- State v. N.B. DCAII-255 · District Court of Appeal 1978
- State v. N.B. 1DII-255 · 1st DCA 1978
- A.W. v. State DCA77-1930 · District Court of Appeal 1978
- Florida Bar SC48946 · Florida Supreme Court 1977
- In re Transition Rule II SC42980 · Florida Supreme Court 1972
0 admin code rules cite Rule 8.180
DCF's rules in Chapter 65C, Florida Administrative Code, that cite it.
No admin code rule cites Rule 8.180.
0 CFOPs cite Rule 8.180
How DCF carries it out. A page opens in the CFOP reader with the citation highlighted.
No CFOP cites Rule 8.180.
Shading shows how often opinions cite each provision: rarely sometimes often most. Click a provision to list the opinions citing it.
(a) Computation. Computation of time shall be governed by Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.514, except for rules 8.013 and 8.010, to which rule 2.514(a)(2)(C) shall not apply and the statutory time period shall govern.
(b) Enlargement of Time. When by these rules or by a notice given thereunder or by order of court an act is required or allowed to be done at or within a specified time, the court for good cause shown may, at any time, in its discretion:
(1) with or without notice, order the period enlarged if request therefor is made before the expiration of the period originally prescribed or as extended by a previous order; or
(2) upon motion made and notice after the expiration of the specified period permit the act to be done where the failure to act was the result of excusable neglect. But it may not, except as provided by law or elsewhere in these rules, extend the time for making a motion for a new trial, a motion for rehearing, judgment of acquittal, vacation of judgment, or for taking an appeal. This rule shall not be construed to apply to detention hearings.
Amendments since the 1991 renumbering
From the Florida Bar edition's table of amending opinions. Where it lists a range of rules ("8.400–8.410"), each rule in the range today is listed.
- Eff. 2021-10-28 Amended · 344 So. 3d 940
- Eff. 1991-07-01 Amended · 589 So.2d 818