Should courts allow participation by alternative methods?25 C.F.R. § 23.133
Statutory authority: 5 U.S.C. § 301, 25 U.S.C. § 2, 25 U.S.C. § 9, 25 U.S.C. § 1901-1952
0 opinions cite 25 C.F.R. § 23.133
No opinion cites this provision by number.
0 admin code rules cite 25 C.F.R. § 23.133
DCF's rules in Chapter 65C, Florida Administrative Code, that cite it.
No admin code rule cites 25 C.F.R. § 23.133.
0 CFOPs cite 25 C.F.R. § 23.133
How DCF carries it out. A page opens in the CFOP reader with the citation highlighted.
No CFOP cites 25 C.F.R. § 23.133.
0 sections of law cite 25 C.F.R. § 23.133
Florida statutes and court rules that cite it, and federal law that cites it.
No other law here cites 25 C.F.R. § 23.133.
Shading shows how often opinions cite each provision: rarely sometimes often most. Click a provision to list the opinions citing it.
If it possesses the capability, the court should allow alternative methods of participation in State-court child-custody proceedings involving an Indian child, such as participation by telephone, videoconferencing, or other methods.
Amended. 2016-12-12 (eCFR).