Dependency Law Finder

Florida's dependency statutes, court rules and DCF operating procedures, with the appellate opinions that apply them

data.robertlathamesq.org · All tools

Before you use this site

This site aggregates legal authorities from a variety of public sources. It is AI and human reviewed. Text processing errors can occur. Always check the information here against the official linked source.

This site is publicly available. Use for general research only. Do not submit confidential or identifiable case information.

I don't agree: show the official sources

How should a State court determine an Indian child's Tribe when the child may be a member or eligible for membership in more than one Tribe?25 C.F.R. § 23.109

Part 23 › Subpart I · Indian Child Welfare Act Proceedings · Indian Child Welfare Act · eCFR · last amended 2016-12-12

0 opinions cite 25 C.F.R. § 23.109

0 admin code rules cite 25 C.F.R. § 23.109

DCF's rules in Chapter 65C, Florida Administrative Code, that cite it.

No admin code rule cites 25 C.F.R. § 23.109.

0 CFOPs cite 25 C.F.R. § 23.109

How DCF carries it out. A page opens in the CFOP reader with the citation highlighted.

No CFOP cites 25 C.F.R. § 23.109.

0 sections of law cite 25 C.F.R. § 23.109

Florida statutes and court rules that cite it, and federal law that cites it.

No other law here cites 25 C.F.R. § 23.109.

Shading shows how often opinions cite each provision: rarely sometimes often most. Click a provision to list the opinions citing it.

(a) If the Indian child is a member or eligible for membership in only one Tribe, that Tribe must be designated as the Indian child's Tribe.

(b) If the Indian child meets the definition of “Indian child” through more than one Tribe, deference should be given to the Tribe in which the Indian child is already a member, unless otherwise agreed to by the Tribes.

(c) If an Indian child meets the definition of “Indian child” through more than one Tribe because the child is a member in more than one Tribe or the child is not a member of but is eligible for membership in more than one Tribe, the court must provide the opportunity in any involuntary child-custody proceeding for the Tribes to determine which should be designated as the Indian child's Tribe.

(1) If the Tribes are able to reach an agreement, the agreed-upon Tribe should be designated as the Indian child's Tribe.

(2) If the Tribes are unable to reach an agreement, the State court designates, for the purposes of ICWA, the Indian Tribe with which the Indian child has the more significant contacts as the Indian child's Tribe, taking into consideration:

(i) Preference of the parents for membership of the child;

(ii) Length of past domicile or residence on or near the reservation of each Tribe;

(iii) Tribal membership of the child's custodial parent or Indian custodian; and

(iv) Interest asserted by each Tribe in the child-custody proceeding;

(v) Whether there has been a previous adjudication with respect to the child by a court of one of the Tribes; and

(vi) Self-identification by the child, if the child is of sufficient age and capacity to meaningfully self-identify.

(3) A determination of the Indian child's Tribe for purposes of ICWA and the regulations in this subpart do not constitute a determination for any other purpose.

Amended. 2016-12-12 (eCFR).