Dependency Law Finder

Florida's dependency statutes, court rules and DCF operating procedures, with the appellate opinions that apply them

data.robertlathamesq.org · All tools

Before you use this site

This site aggregates legal authorities from a variety of public sources. It is AI and human reviewed. Text processing errors can occur. Always check the information here against the official linked source.

This site is publicly available. Use for general research only. Do not submit confidential or identifiable case information.

I don't agree: show the official sources

In re S.J.W.480 So. 2d 262 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986) · DCABK-247

Court
District Court of Appeal
Decided
1986-01-03
Law cited
§ 39.01(1) · § 39.413 (now § 39.510)
On CourtListener
PER CURIAM.

After entry of an order declaring her two minor children to be dependent and placing custody with the paternal grandmother, the mother filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus on the ground that the order is illegal. We treat the petition as an appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.040(c) and § 39.413, Fla.Stat.

The dependency order was entered pursuant to a petition filed by the grandmother five days after the death of the children’s father. The sole ground raised by the petition was that the mother abandoned the children approximately three months ago. No allegations regarding the mother’s fitness or ability to care for the children were raised. Section 39.01(1) defines “abandoned” as a period of six months or longer during which a parent makes no effort to communicate with the child. Thus, the petition was facially insufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of the circuit court under chapter 39 and the dependency order is predicated on a finding in contravention of the statutorily prescribed time period. Therefore, the order is reversed.

SHIVERS, ZEHMER and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Opinion text: CourtListener, Free Law Project. Not an official reporter; check the court's version before citing.