Dependency Law Finder

Florida's dependency statutes, court rules and DCF operating procedures, with the appellate opinions that apply them

data.robertlathamesq.org · All tools

Before you use this site

This site aggregates legal authorities from a variety of public sources. It is AI and human reviewed. Text processing errors can occur. Always check the information here against the official linked source.

This site is publicly available. Use for general research only. Do not submit confidential or identifiable case information.

I don't agree: show the official sources

Barrientos v. State705 So. 2d 1066 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998) · DCA96-01763

Court
District Court of Appeal
Decided
1998-02-20
On CourtListener
PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges his sentence of adult sanctions for various violent felonies committed in connection with a home invasion. Because the trial court failed to enter a written order on adult sanctions in accordance with the mandate set forth in Troutman v. State, 630 So.2d 528 (Fla.1993), we reverse and remand for resentencing.

Appellant has previously challenged his sentence based on the trial court’s failure to make any written findings to support adult sanctions. This court remanded the ease for resentencing in compliance with section 39.059(7)(c),(d), Florida Statutes (1993), and Troutman. See Barrientos v. State, 665 So.2d 243 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

In this appeal Barrientos argues he is again entitled to resentencing because the trial court’s written reasons for imposing adult sanctions were reduced to writing and filed three days after sentencing rather than on the same day as required by Troutman. We agree. On remand the trial court shall enter written reasons in support of adult sanctions contemporaneously with resentenc-ing.

Reversed.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Opinion text: CourtListener, Free Law Project. Not an official reporter; check the court's version before citing.