Dependency Law Finder

Florida's dependency statutes, court rules and DCF operating procedures, with the appellate opinions that apply them

data.robertlathamesq.org · All tools

Before you use this site

This site aggregates legal authorities from a variety of public sources. It is AI and human reviewed. Text processing errors can occur. Always check the information here against the official linked source.

This site is publicly available. Use for general research only. Do not submit confidential or identifiable case information.

I don't agree: show the official sources

Gelrod v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services648 So. 2d 862 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995) · DCA94-1621

Court
District Court of Appeal
Decided
1995-02-01
On CourtListener
PER CURIAM.

The mother, Samantha Gelrod, appeals from an amended final order adjudicating her son, J.A., dependent. We affirm.

The mother contends that the evidence of neglect is legally insufficient to support an adjudication of dependency in accordance with section 39.01(37), Florida Statutes (1993). We disagree.

“An adjudication of dependency must be based upon a showing of abuse, abandonment, or neglect.” I.T. v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Servs., 532 So.2d 1085, 1087 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); § 39.01(10)(a), Fla. Stat. (1993). Additionally, “[pjroof of neglect sufficient to establish a state of dependency must be met by a preponderance of the evidence standard.” I.T., 532 So.2d at 1087; § 39.408(2)(b), Fla.Stat. (1993).

After a review of the record, we find that there is a preponderance of the evidence to support the trial court’s finding that the mother neglected her child. Therefore, the *863trial court properly adjudicated J.A. dependent.

Accordingly, we affirm.

Opinion text: CourtListener, Free Law Project. Not an official reporter; check the court's version before citing.