Appellant seeks review of a judgment of conviction and sentence by which he was sentenced as a youthful offender after conviction in an adult court. The record reflects that the trial court did not comply with section 39.111(7)(d), Florida Statutes, which requires a written record of the trial court’s decision to impose adult sanctions against a juvenile. We cannot determine from the record whether the trial court considered each of the six criteria enumerated in section 39.111(7)(c) in determinin'g the suitability of adult sanctions against appellant. Therefore, we reverse and remand for resentencing in compliance with the statute. Martin v. State, 547 So.2d 998 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).
Hope v. State562 So. 2d 863 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990) · DCA89-2342
- Decided
- 1990-06-26
- Law cited
- § 39.111(7)(c), (7)(d)
Opinion text: CourtListener, Free Law Project. Not an official reporter; check the court's version before citing.
Cited by 1 opinion
In this collection (1)
From CourtListener's citation data, every court it covers, which can miss citations (in short or unpublished orders especially).
Cites 1 opinion in this collection
Citations to cases outside the collection are linked in the opinion text itself.