Appellant’s counsel has filed a brief consistent with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We have carefully reviewed the record and the brief filed on behalf of the appellant and find that there is substantial competent evidence to support the verdict and judgment. See, Tibbs v. State, 397 So.2d 1120 (Fla.1981). Accordingly, the judgment and conviction is affirmed and counsel for the appellant’s motion to withdraw is granted.
In re W.L.F.408 So. 2d 1089 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982) · DCA81-434
- Decided
- 1982-01-20
Opinion text: CourtListener, Free Law Project. Not an official reporter; check the court's version before citing.
Cited by 1 opinion
None in this collection.
Elsewhere (1, on CourtListener)
From CourtListener's citation data, every court it covers, which can miss citations (in short or unpublished orders especially).
Cites 1 opinion in this collection
Citations to cases outside the collection are linked in the opinion text itself.