Dependency Law Finder

Florida's dependency statutes, court rules and DCF operating procedures, with the appellate opinions that apply them

data.robertlathamesq.org · All tools

Before you use this site

This site aggregates legal authorities from a variety of public sources. It is AI and human reviewed. Text processing errors can occur. Always check the information here against the official linked source.

This site is publicly available. Use for general research only. Do not submit confidential or identifiable case information.

I don't agree: show the official sources

S.W. v. State391 So. 2d 224 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980) · DCA79-1788

Court
District Court of Appeal
Decided
1980-11-18
Law cited
§ 39.10
On CourtListener
DANIEL S. PEARSON, Judge.

S. W., a juvenile, was found guilty of having committed first-degree arson in violation of Section 806.01, Florida Statutes (1979). The trial court withheld adjudication of delinquency and placed the juvenile in the custody of relatives to be returned to his mother in Massachusetts.1

We reverse the finding of guilt upon a holding that (a) in order to sustain a conviction for first-degree arson, the State must prove that the fire was set wilfully and maliciously, Love v. State, 107 Fla. 376, 144 So. 843 (1932); see also K.R.M. v. State, 360 So.2d 806 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Dodson v. State, 334 So.2d 305 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); (b) the evidence was totally consistent with the hypothesis that the fire was inadvertently caused by the juvenile throwing a cigarette, and thus insufficient to establish the required intent, McArthur v. State, 351 So.2d 972 (Fla.1977); Mayo v. State, 71 So.2d 899 (Fla.1954); Diaz v. State, 387 So.2d 978 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

Reversed.

. This disposition is not in accord with Section 39.10, Florida Statutes (1979). We need not, however, address this issue.

Opinion text: CourtListener, Free Law Project. Not an official reporter; check the court's version before citing.