Dependency Law Finder

Florida's dependency statutes, court rules and DCF operating procedures, with the appellate opinions that apply them

data.robertlathamesq.org · All tools

Before you use this site

This site aggregates legal authorities from a variety of public sources. It is AI and human reviewed. Text processing errors can occur. Always check the information here against the official linked source.

This site is publicly available. Use for general research only. Do not submit confidential or identifiable case information.

I don't agree: show the official sources

Bissonette v. State307 So. 2d 222 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975) · DCA73-1163

Court
District Court of Appeal
Decided
1975-01-10
Law cited
§ 39.02(6)
On CourtListener
PER CURIAM.

Upon examination of the record and consideration of all the points raised in this appeal, we are of the opinion that no reversible error has been demonstrated. The issue of the constitutionality of F.S. 39.02(6) (c), 1971, was not raised and directly passed upon by the trial court and as such is precluded from consideration by this court. State v. McInnes, Fla.App.1961, 133 So.2d 581; see also Franklin v. State, Fla.App.1973, 285 So.2d 32; Mann v. State, Fla.App. 1968, 209 So.2d 472; but see Papp v. State, Fla.App.1973, 281 So.2d 600.

Accordingly, the judgment and conviction are affirmed.

MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ., and ALDERMAN, JAMES E., Associate Judge, concur.

Opinion text: CourtListener, Free Law Project. Not an official reporter; check the court's version before citing.