Dependency Law Finder

Florida's dependency statutes, court rules and DCF operating procedures, with the appellate opinions that apply them

data.robertlathamesq.org · All tools

Before you use this site

This site aggregates legal authorities from a variety of public sources. It is AI and human reviewed. Text processing errors can occur. Always check the information here against the official linked source.

This site is publicly available. Use for general research only. Do not submit confidential or identifiable case information.

I don't agree: show the official sources

L.E. v. Department of Children & Family Services101 So. 3d 382 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) · CL4986693

Court
2nd DCA
Decided
2012-10-26
Case
TPR
Appellant
Mother

Affirmed Termination of the mother's rights to three children affirmed as supported by competent substantial evidence of case plan noncompliance.

Issue
TPR ground: case plan noncompliance / continuing abuse
Law cited
§ 39.806(1)(e)

Summary, issues, facts, outcome, and appellant were extracted automatically from the opinion. Check the opinion itself before relying on them.

On CourtListener
KHOUZAM, Judge.

L.E., the Mother, appeals two final judgments terminating her parental rights to her three children. The judgments were entered following a single trial addressing her rights to all three children.

On appeal, L.E. argues that the evidence was insufficient to support termination under section 39.806(1)(e), Florida Statutes (2010). We disagree. The final judgment of termination is supported by competent, substantial evidence introduced at trial. Consequently, the trial court did *383not err in terminating the Mother’s parental rights and we must affirm.

Judgments affirmed.

LaROSE and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

Opinion text: CourtListener, Free Law Project. Not an official reporter; check the court's version before citing.