Dependency Law Finder

Florida's dependency statutes, court rules and DCF operating procedures, with the appellate opinions that apply them

data.robertlathamesq.org · All tools

Before you use this site

This site aggregates legal authorities from a variety of public sources. It is AI and human reviewed. Text processing errors can occur. Always check the information here against the official linked source.

This site is publicly available. Use for general research only. Do not submit confidential or identifiable case information.

I don't agree: show the official sources

J.S. v. Department of Children & Families211 So. 3d 1146 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) · 5D16-4267-2

Court
5th DCA
Decided
2017-03-07
Case
TPR
Appellant
Mother

Reversed & remanded Termination reversed on DCF's concession that the evidence did not legally support a finding that the mother failed to substantially comply with her case plan.

Issue
TPR ground: case plan noncompliance / continuing abuse
Facts
Domestic violence, Parent's substance abuse

Summary, issues, facts, outcome, and appellant were extracted automatically from the opinion. Check the opinion itself before relying on them.

On CourtListener
COHEN, C.J.

J.S. appeals the order terminating her parental rights to three children, M.S., E.D., and J.D., who at the time of trial ranged from five to ten years old. The sole ground for termination of parental rights was J.S.’s failure to substantially comply with the case plan.

The children were initially removed from the home because of ongoing domestic violence involving J.S. and her boyfriend. During the course of the original court-ordered case plan, the mother tested positive for a controlled substance. As a result, four months before the termination of parental rights trial, the case plan was modified to require random drug tests and substance abuse counseling.

In its final order, the trial court terminated J.S.’s parental rights pursuant to section 39.806(1)(e)l., Florida Statutes *1147(2016), finding that J.S. failed to substantially comply with the modified case plan. We have reviewed the trial transcript and accept the Department’s concession that the evidence at the termination of parental rights trial was not legally sufficient to support the trial court’s finding. Accordingly, we reverse the order terminating J.S.’s parental rights and remand for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

EVANDER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Opinion text: CourtListener, Free Law Project. Not an official reporter; check the court's version before citing.