Dependency Law Finder

Florida's dependency statutes, court rules and DCF operating procedures, with the appellate opinions that apply them

data.robertlathamesq.org · All tools

Before you use this site

This site aggregates legal authorities from a variety of public sources. It is AI and human reviewed. Text processing errors can occur. Always check the information here against the official linked source.

This site is publicly available. Use for general research only. Do not submit confidential or identifiable case information.

I don't agree: show the official sources

L.M.C. v. Department of Children & Families935 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) · 5D06-713

Court
5th DCA
Decided
2006-07-24
Case
Dependency
Appellant
Both parents

Reversed Shelter order reversed because the trial court refused to let the parents present evidence contesting probable cause at the shelter hearing.

Issues
Shelter, Right to be heard & hearing procedure

Summary, issues, facts, outcome, and appellant were extracted automatically from the opinion. Check the opinion itself before relying on them.

On CourtListener
935 So.2d 47 (2006)

L.M.C. and A.O., Parents of A.E., and T.C., etc., Appellants,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

No. 5D06-713.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

July 24, 2006.

Timothy A. Straus, of Moyer, Straus & Patel, Altamonte Springs, for Appellant, L.M.C.

Ryan Thomas Truskoski of Ryan Thomas Truskoski, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant, A.O.

Charles D. Peters, Orlando, for Appellee.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PLEUS, C.J.

We deny the Department of Children and Families' motion for certification, grant its motion for rehearing, withdraw our prior opinion and substitute this one in its stead.

The parents appeal a shelter order entered after the trial court denied their request to present evidence on the issue of probable cause. We have previously held that parents have a statutory right to present evidence contesting probable cause at shelter hearings. See A.M.T. v. Dep't of Children and Families, 890 So.2d 551 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); S.M. v. Dep't of Children and Families, 890 So.2d 552 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); In re J.P., 875 So.2d 715 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). While we are sympathetic to the desire of trial courts to conduct shelter hearings in an informal and expeditious manner, those concerns do not outweigh the right of parents to be heard initially when faced with removal by the State of their children from their home. Accordingly, we reverse.

REVERSED.

MONACO and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Opinion text: CourtListener, Free Law Project. Not an official reporter; check the court's version before citing.