Dependency Law Finder

Florida's dependency statutes, court rules and DCF operating procedures, with the appellate opinions that apply them

data.robertlathamesq.org · All tools

Before you use this site

This site aggregates legal authorities from a variety of public sources. It is AI and human reviewed. Text processing errors can occur. Always check the information here against the official linked source.

This site is publicly available. Use for general research only. Do not submit confidential or identifiable case information.

I don't agree: show the official sources

L.C. v. Department of Children & Families901 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) · 5D04-2486

Court
5th DCA
Decided
2005-05-20
Case
TPR
Appellant
Other

Affirmed Short affirmance of a termination as supported by clear and convincing evidence and the children's best interests.

Issues
TPR: sufficiency of evidence, general, Manifest best interests

Summary, issues, facts, outcome, and appellant were extracted automatically from the opinion. Check the opinion itself before relying on them.

On CourtListener
PER CURIAM.

As there was clear and convincing evidence to support the termination of parental rights of the appellant, and as it appears that termination of the appellant’s parental rights is in the best interest of the children, we affirm. See N.L. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 843 So.2d 996 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).

AFFIRMED.

SHARP, W., PETERSON and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Opinion text: CourtListener, Free Law Project. Not an official reporter; check the court's version before citing.