Dependency Law Finder

Florida's dependency statutes, court rules and DCF operating procedures, with the appellate opinions that apply them

data.robertlathamesq.org · All tools

Before you use this site

This site aggregates legal authorities from a variety of public sources. It is AI and human reviewed. Text processing errors can occur. Always check the information here against the official linked source.

This site is publicly available. Use for general research only. Do not submit confidential or identifiable case information.

I don't agree: show the official sources

R.D. v. Department of Children & Families4D21-3030

Court
4th DCA
Decided
2022-03-30
Case
TPR
Appellant
Mother
County
Broward

Affirmed Termination affirmed without discussion; the court certified the question whether the no-nexus sibling provision of the egregious conduct ground is unconstitutional.

Issue
TPR ground: egregious conduct

Summary, issues, facts, outcome, and appellant were extracted automatically from the opinion. Check the opinion itself before relying on them.

Court's PDF On CourtListener
       DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                             FOURTH DISTRICT
                            R.D., the mother,
                               Appellant,
                                    v.
              DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,
                     and GUARDIAN AD LITEM,
                            Appellees.
                             No. 4D21-3030
                            [March 30, 2022]
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Shari Africk Olefson, Judge; L.T. Case No. 19-2091DP.
   Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Richard G. Bartmon, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
  Carolyn Schwarz, Children’s Legal Services, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee Department of Children and Families.
   Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Sarah Todd Weitz, Senior Attorney, Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for appellee Guardian ad Litem. PER CURIAM.
   We affirm without discussion, on all arguments raised, the         circuit court’s final order terminating the mother’s parental rights. As in   V.S. v. Department of Children & Families, 
322 So. 3d 1153
 (Fla. 4th DCA      2021), we also certify the following question of great public importance     to the supreme court:

      Does the 2014 amendment to section 39.806(1)(f), Florida
      Statutes, which provides that no proof of nexus between
      egregious conduct toward one child is required to terminate
      the parental rights of the child’s siblings, unconstitutionally
      remove the state’s burden to prove that the egregious
      conduct poses a substantial risk of harm to each sibling and
     is the least restrictive means of protecting the sibling(s) from
     serious harm?

  Affirmed; question certified.

CONNER, C.J., GERBER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

                           *        *          *

  Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. 

Opinion text: CourtListener, Free Law Project. Not an official reporter; check the court's version before citing.