Dependency Law Finder

Florida's dependency statutes, court rules and DCF operating procedures, with the appellate opinions that apply them

data.robertlathamesq.org · All tools

Before you use this site

This site aggregates legal authorities from a variety of public sources. It is AI and human reviewed. Text processing errors can occur. Always check the information here against the official linked source.

This site is publicly available. Use for general research only. Do not submit confidential or identifiable case information.

I don't agree: show the official sources

S.D. v. Department of Children & Families967 So. 2d 1016 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) · 4D07-2617

Court
4th DCA
Decided
2007-10-31
Case
TPR
Appellant
Father

Reversed Termination reversed because no termination petition was ever filed, so the court's jurisdiction was not invoked; DCF may file a new petition.

Issue
Trial-court jurisdiction & venue
Law cited
§ 39.802(1) · Rule 8.500(a)(1)

Summary, issues, facts, outcome, and appellant were extracted automatically from the opinion. Check the opinion itself before relying on them.

On CourtListener
WARNER, J.

In challenging the order terminating his parental rights as to his son, appellant claims that the trial court erred because no petition for termination was filed. Appellant is correct in that no petition appears in the record. To make sure that no petition was filed, we entered an order requiring the clerk to supplement the record with the petition, if one was filed. The clerk filed a response stating that no peti*1017tion had been filed. Although the department contends that a petition must have been filed, it has not brought anything to our attention which would establish that it prepared and filed a petition which has simply been lost.

The jurisdiction of the court over a parent in a termination proceeding is invoked by the filing of a petition. See § 39.802(1), Fla. Stat. (“[a]ll proceedings seeking an adjudication to terminate parental rights pursuant to this chapter must be initiated by the filing of an original petition”); Fla. R. Juv. Pro. 8.500(a)(1) (“All proceedings seeking the termination of parental rights to a child shall be initiated by the filing of an original petition in the pending dependency action, if any.”) (emphasis supplied). Because the trial court’s jurisdiction was not properly invoked, we reverse. Our reversal is without prejudice to the department filing a new petition for termination of parental rights, properly invoking the jurisdiction of the court.

HAZOURI, J., and CHUMBLEY, DOUGLAS J., Associate Judge, concur.

Opinion text: CourtListener, Free Law Project. Not an official reporter; check the court's version before citing.