Dependency Law Finder

Florida's dependency statutes, court rules and DCF operating procedures, with the appellate opinions that apply them

data.robertlathamesq.org · All tools

Before you use this site

This site aggregates legal authorities from a variety of public sources. It is AI and human reviewed. Text processing errors can occur. Always check the information here against the official linked source.

This site is publicly available. Use for general research only. Do not submit confidential or identifiable case information.

I don't agree: show the official sources

Z.M. v. Department of Children & Families853 So. 2d 1084 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) · 4D03-662

Court
4th DCA
Decided
2003-06-25
Case
TPR
Appellant
Both parents

Reversed Refusal to vacate a default consent to termination reversed as an abuse of discretion where the parents arrived an hour late after a transit mistake.

Issue
Default & consent by nonappearance
Law cited
§ 39.801(3)(d) (now § 39.801(3)(e))

Summary, issues, facts, outcome, and appellant were extracted automatically from the opinion. Check the opinion itself before relying on them.

On CourtListener
853 So.2d 1084 (2003)

A.M. and Z.M., Appellants,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

Nos. 4D03-662, 4D03-914, 4D03-885, 4D03-913.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 25, 2003.
Rehearing Denied September 26, 2003.

Kathleen K. Pena of Law Offices of Kathleen K. Pena, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant A.M.

Denise E. Kistner of Law Offices of Denise E. Kistner, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant Z.M.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court entered a default against parents of S.M. who were late for a hearing in their termination of parental rights case filed against them by the Florida Department of Children and Families. Because they were mistaken about the public transportation schedule, the parents arrived at the courthouse about one hour after their hearing was to begin. The *1085 default had the effect of consenting to the termination of their parental rights. The trial court held a hearing on the parents' motion to set aside the default, and denied the motion.

This court recently decided two strikingly similar cases. See A.J. v. Dep't of Children and Families, 845 So.2d 973 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); R.P. v. Dep't of Children and Families, 835 So.2d 1212 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).

Significant in the present case, as in R.P., this court discussed section 39.801(3)(d), Florida Statutes, explaining that although the statute authorizes a default at the advisory hearing in termination of parental rights cases,

courts should ordinarily refrain from determining a termination of parental rights by default where an absent parent is making reasonable effort to be present at the scheduled hearing and is delayed by forces or circumstances beyond the parent's control.[1]

835 So.2d at 1214.

We find the refusal to vacate the default an abuse of discretion.

REVERSED.

STONE, FARMER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

NOTES

[1] Section 39.801(3)(d), Florida Statutes (2001), provides "If the person served with notice under this section fails to personally appear at the advisory hearing, the failure to personally appear shall constitute consent for termination of parental rights by the person given notice."

Opinion text: CourtListener, Free Law Project. Not an official reporter; check the court's version before citing.