Dependency Law Finder

Florida's dependency statutes, court rules and DCF operating procedures, with the appellate opinions that apply them

data.robertlathamesq.org · All tools

Before you use this site

This site aggregates legal authorities from a variety of public sources. It is AI and human reviewed. Text processing errors can occur. Always check the information here against the official linked source.

This site is publicly available. Use for general research only. Do not submit confidential or identifiable case information.

I don't agree: show the official sources

In re D.A.M.185 So. 3d 535 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) · 3D15-1154-2

Court
3rd DCA
Decided
2015-10-28
Case
Dependency
Appellant
Child

Affirmed Denial of two brothers' private dependency petition affirmed as bound by circuit precedent on immigrant-juvenile petitions.

Issue
Dependency adjudication: sufficiency of evidence
Facts
Immigration

Summary, issues, facts, outcome, and appellant were extracted automatically from the opinion. Check the opinion itself before relying on them.

On CourtListener
SUAREZ, C.J.

D.A.M.(1) and D.A.M,(2), his younger brother (the “children”)1, appeal the trial court’s denial of their private petition seeking an adjudication of dependency.

We are bound to follow In re B.Y.G.M., 176 So.3d 290, (Fla. 3d DCA July 15, 2015), and In re K.B.L.V., 176 So.3d 297, (Fla. 3d DCA July 15, 2015) and, therefore, affirm.

, The children are currently 16 and 14 years old -respectively. Thus, this case is distinguishable from O.I.C.L. v. Department of Children & Families, 169 So.3d 1244 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) which concluded that private petitions similar to those here “routinely share the following elements; the child is about to turn eighteen years old.”

Opinion text: CourtListener, Free Law Project. Not an official reporter; check the court's version before citing.