Dependency Law Finder

Florida's dependency statutes, court rules and DCF operating procedures, with the appellate opinions that apply them

data.robertlathamesq.org · All tools

Before you use this site

This site aggregates legal authorities from a variety of public sources. It is AI and human reviewed. Text processing errors can occur. Always check the information here against the official linked source.

This site is publicly available. Use for general research only. Do not submit confidential or identifiable case information.

I don't agree: show the official sources

A.M.D. v. Department of Children & Families19 So. 3d 435 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) · 3D09-1110

Court
3rd DCA
Decided
2009-09-30
Case
TPR
Appellant
Father

Affirmed Termination affirmed because ample evidence showed the father failed to comply with his case plan and abandoned the child; the continuing-threat ground was not reached.

Issues
TPR ground: case plan noncompliance / continuing abuse, TPR ground: abandonment

Summary, issues, facts, outcome, and appellant were extracted automatically from the opinion. Check the opinion itself before relying on them.

On CourtListener
PER CURIAM.

Because the record contains ample evidence to support the termination of appellant-father’s parental rights on grounds of failure to comply with his case plan, § 39.806(1)(e)l., Fla. Stat. (2008), and abandonment, § 39.806(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (2008),1 the judgment under review is affirmed.

Affirmed.

. We do not reach the sufficiency of the evidence as to section 39.806(1)(c), Florida Statutes (2008).

Opinion text: CourtListener, Free Law Project. Not an official reporter; check the court's version before citing.