Affirmed. See A.W. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 969 So.2d 496, 497 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (“Appellant’s purported substantial compliance with her case plan was merely technical, at most, and in no way demonstrated her ability to comprehend and implement the basic parenting skills and practices necessary to assure her child’s health, safety, and well-being.”); M.M. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 867 So.2d 573, 574 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) (finding substantial, competent evidence that petitioner “has authored her own undoing”).
YF v. Department of Children & Families18 So. 3d 1258 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) · 3D09-1097
- Court
- 3rd DCA
- Decided
- 2009-10-14
Opinion text: CourtListener, Free Law Project. Not an official reporter; check the court's version before citing.
Not cited
No opinion in CourtListener's collection cites this case.
Cites 2 opinions in this collection
Citations to cases outside the collection are linked in the opinion text itself.
- A.W. v. Department of Children & Families 1D07-1724 · 1st DCA 2007Termination affirmed because the developmentally disabled mother's technical case plan compliance did not remedy unsafe conditions or show parenting ability; limited post-termination letters were upheld.
- M.M. v. Department of Children & Family Services 3D03-335 · 3rd DCA 2004Termination affirmed because the mother, after repeated chances over five years, failed to complete case plan tasks including stable housing and employment.