Affirmed. See K.B. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 834 So.2d 368 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); F.A.F. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 804 So.2d 616 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); J.M. v. Florida Dep’t of Children & Families, 762 So.2d 1029 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).
R.J. v. Department of Children & Family Services866 So. 2d 215 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) · 3D03-2304
- Court
- 3rd DCA
- Decided
- 2004-02-25
Opinion text: CourtListener, Free Law Project. Not an official reporter; check the court's version before citing.
Not cited
No opinion in CourtListener's collection cites this case.
Cites 3 opinions in this collection
Citations to cases outside the collection are linked in the opinion text itself.
- K.B. v. Department of Children & Families 5D02-1629 · 5th DCA 2003Termination affirmed; rejecting placement with the maternal great-grandmother was supported, and least restrictive means does not preserve parental bonds at the child's expense.
- F.A.F. v. Department of Children & Family Services 3D01-539 · 3rd DCA 2002Termination affirmed: the father's drug involvement, probation violations, and failure to contact or visit the children supported threat and egregious-conduct grounds.
- J.M. v. Department of Children & Families 3D99-2531 · 3rd DCA 2000Termination affirmed: the petition under the threat-to-child ground needed no twelve-month case plan period, so it was not premature, and the evidence was sufficient.