Dependency Law Finder

Florida's dependency statutes, court rules and DCF operating procedures, with the appellate opinions that apply them

data.robertlathamesq.org · All tools

Before you use this site

This site aggregates legal authorities from a variety of public sources. It is AI and human reviewed. Text processing errors can occur. Always check the information here against the official linked source.

This site is publicly available. Use for general research only. Do not submit confidential or identifiable case information.

I don't agree: show the official sources

McGillis v. Department of Children & Family Services826 So. 2d 1028 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) · 3D01-1370

Court
3rd DCA
Decided
2001-09-19
Law cited
§ 39.01(50) (now § 39.01(60)) · § 39.701(7), (8) (now § 39.701(2)(c), § 39.701(2)(d))
On CourtListener
PER CURIAM.

No harmful error or abuse of discretion has been demonstrated in either the order, on appeal in case no. 3D00-841, which prohibits appellant from contact with one and limits it with another juvenile relative, see § 39.701(7),(8), Fla. Stat. (2000); 3 Fla.Jur.2d Appellate Review § 299 (1997), or the order, on appeal in case no. 3D01-1370, which terminates his status as a participant in the cases of three others. See McGillis v. Department of Children & Family Servs., 719 So.2d 967 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); § 39.01(50), Fla. Stat. (2000). See generally, Gott v. Department of Children, Youth & Families, 723 So.2d 936 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); L.B. v. C.A., 738 So.2d 425 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Florida Dept. of Health & Rehab. Servs. v. Doe, 659 So.2d *1029697 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995), review denied, 668 So.2d 602 (Fla.1996).

Affirmed.

Opinion text: CourtListener, Free Law Project. Not an official reporter; check the court's version before citing.