Dependency Law Finder

Florida's dependency statutes, court rules and DCF operating procedures, with the appellate opinions that apply them

data.robertlathamesq.org · All tools

Before you use this site

This site aggregates legal authorities from a variety of public sources. It is AI and human reviewed. Text processing errors can occur. Always check the information here against the official linked source.

This site is publicly available. Use for general research only. Do not submit confidential or identifiable case information.

I don't agree: show the official sources

C.S. v. Department of Children & Families204 So. 3d 121 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) · 2D16-1574

Court
2nd DCA
Decided
2016-11-16
Case
Dependency
Appellant
Mother
County
Collier

Reversed & remanded Order closing the case reversed on DCF's concession: no written dependency order, no disposition hearing, and no proper notice to the mother.

Issues
Written findings & sufficiency of the order, Notice & service of process, Right to be heard & hearing procedure, Disposition, case plan & reasonable efforts
Law cited
§ 39.521

Summary, issues, facts, outcome, and appellant were extracted automatically from the opinion. Check the opinion itself before relying on them.

Court's PDF On CourtListener
SLEET, Judge.

C.S., • the natural mother of D.S. and G.S., appeals an order denying her motion to vacate an order closing the case and terminating the court’s jurisdiction over the case. The proceeding that led to the entry of the order closing the ease had been entered on the court’s “own motion” without proper notice to the mother, and the order was entered over objection by the Department of Children and Families and the mother. In light of the Depart *122 ment’s concession of error in this case, we decline to discuss all of the proceedings below. We observe only that prior to entering the order closing the case, the trial court had orally adjudicated the children dependent, but it had failed to enter a written order adjudicating the children dependent and it had failed to conduct a disposition hearing. The Department concedes that, under the facts in this case, the trial court was required to conduct a disposition hearing under section 39.521, Florida Statutes (2015), before closing the case and terminating jurisdiction. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the trial court 1 to enter a written order adjudicating the children dependent, hold a properly noticed disposition hearing, and enter a disposition order. The children shall remain in their current placement pending the entry of a disposition order.

Reversed and remanded.

NORTHCUTT and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.
1

. A successor judge has been appointed to handle the case.

Opinion text: CourtListener, Free Law Project. Not an official reporter; check the court's version before citing.