Dependency Law Finder

Florida's dependency statutes, court rules and DCF operating procedures, with the appellate opinions that apply them

data.robertlathamesq.org · All tools

Before you use this site

This site aggregates legal authorities from a variety of public sources. It is AI and human reviewed. Text processing errors can occur. Always check the information here against the official linked source.

This site is publicly available. Use for general research only. Do not submit confidential or identifiable case information.

I don't agree: show the official sources

R.A. v. Department of Children & Family Services813 So. 2d 208 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) · 2D01-2289

Court
2nd DCA
Decided
2002-04-03
Case
TPR
Appellant
Father

Reversed & remanded Termination reversed and remanded because DCF conceded the court did not meet the consent-by-nonappearance requirements of section 39.801(3)(d).

Issue
Default & consent by nonappearance
Law cited
§ 39.801(3)(d) (now § 39.801(3)(e))

Summary, issues, facts, outcome, and appellant were extracted automatically from the opinion. Check the opinion itself before relying on them.

On CourtListener
COVINGTON, Judge.

R.A. challenges the trial court’s order terminating his parental rights to his two children, E.A. and S.O. The Department of Children and Family Services concedes that the trial court did not satisfy the requirements of section 39.801(3)(d), Florida Statutes (2000). Therefore; this court need not address the constitutionality of section 39.801(3)(d). We reverse the order terminating parental rights and remand for further proceedings.

Reverse and remand.

GREEN and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.

Opinion text: CourtListener, Free Law Project. Not an official reporter; check the court's version before citing.