Dependency Law Finder

Florida's dependency statutes, court rules and DCF operating procedures, with the appellate opinions that apply them

data.robertlathamesq.org · All tools

Before you use this site

This site aggregates legal authorities from a variety of public sources. It is AI and human reviewed. Text processing errors can occur. Always check the information here against the official linked source.

This site is publicly available. Use for general research only. Do not submit confidential or identifiable case information.

I don't agree: show the official sources

Shook v. State603 So. 2d 617 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) · 1D91-2536

Court
1st DCA
Decided
1992-08-03
On CourtListener
603 So.2d 617 (1992)

Stephen Allen SHOOK, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 91-2536.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 3, 1992.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Sara D. Baggett, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

MINER, Judge.

Appellant seeks review of the habitual offender sentence imposed upon him as the result of his plea of nolo contendere to the offense of burglary of a dwelling. We reverse and remand for resentencing.

At appellant's sentencing hearing, the state introduced two previous juvenile delinquency adjudications as the basis for habitualization. Based upon these juvenile adjudications of delinquency, the trial judge found appellant to be an habitual offender and sentenced him accordingly.

On appeal, the state concedes appellant was improperly sentenced as an habitual felony offender based on juvenile adjudications of delinquency. We agree.

Section 39.10(4), Florida Statutes (1989),[1] provides that, except for use in subsequent proceedings under chapter 39, an adjudication of delinquency "shall not be deemed a conviction." Because section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1989), requires prior felony "convictions" without specifically including juvenile adjudications, habitualization cannot be based upon juvenile adjudications.

*618 REVERSED and REMANDED for resentencing.

ERVIN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

NOTES

[1] This provision, with minor modifications not relevant here, can now be found in section 39.053(4), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1990).

Opinion text: CourtListener, Free Law Project. Not an official reporter; check the court's version before citing.