Dependency Law Finder

Florida's dependency statutes, court rules and DCF operating procedures, with the appellate opinions that apply them

data.robertlathamesq.org · All tools

Before you use this site

This site aggregates legal authorities from a variety of public sources. It is AI and human reviewed. Text processing errors can occur. Always check the information here against the official linked source.

This site is publicly available. Use for general research only. Do not submit confidential or identifiable case information.

I don't agree: show the official sources

E.P. v. Department of Children & Families1D2024-2901-2

Court
1st DCA
Decided
2025-05-09
Case
Dependency
Appellant
Mother
County
Leon

Dismissed Appeal dismissed as moot because the child is now over eighteen and no longer a child under Chapter 39.

Issue
Appellate jurisdiction & timeliness

Summary, issues, facts, outcome, and appellant were extracted automatically from the opinion. Check the opinion itself before relying on them.

Court's PDF On CourtListener
          FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                 STATE OF FLORIDA
                 _____________________________

                        No. 1D2024-2901
                 _____________________________

E.P., Mother of S.M., a Minor Child,

    Appellant,

    v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and GUARDIAN AD LITEM,

    Appellees.
                 _____________________________


On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Barbara K. Hobbs, Judge.


                           May 9, 2025

                   ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

     The court grants the motion for rehearing and substitutes the prior opinion with the following.

    The court denies the motion to compel docketed on March 21, 2025. The court grants the motions to dismiss submitted by the appellees. See § 39.01(12), Fla. Stat. (defining “child” and “youth” to mean “any unmarried person under the age of 18 years who has not been emancipated by order of the court”); § 39.621(10), Fla. Stat. (stating that “permanency placement is intended to continue until the child reaches the age of majority”); cf. O.I.C.L. v. Fla. Dep’t of Child. & Fams., 
205 So. 3d 575, 578
 (Fla. 2016) (holding that appellate question pertaining to denial of private petition for dependency was moot because “an individual over the age of 18 fails to satisfy Florida’s statutory definition of a ‘child’ who can be adjudicated a dependent child”).

    DISMISSED as moot.

LEWIS, WINOKUR, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur.
              _____________________________

    Not final until disposition of any timely and
    authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
    9.331.
               _____________________________


E.B., pro se, Appellant.

Sarah J. Rumph, Children’s Legal Services, Tallahassee, for Appellee Department of Children and Families.

Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Sarah T. Weitz, Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for Appellee Guardian ad Litem. 

Opinion text: CourtListener, Free Law Project. Not an official reporter; check the court's version before citing.