Dependency Law Finder

Florida's dependency statutes, court rules and DCF operating procedures, with the appellate opinions that apply them

data.robertlathamesq.org · All tools

Before you use this site

This site aggregates legal authorities from a variety of public sources. It is AI and human reviewed. Text processing errors can occur. Always check the information here against the official linked source.

This site is publicly available. Use for general research only. Do not submit confidential or identifiable case information.

I don't agree: show the official sources

Department of Children & Families v. T.H.1D15-4198

Court
1st DCA
Decided
2016-03-20
Case
Dependency
Appellant
DCF
County
Santa Rosa

Affirmed Dependency court's order placing the child with paternal grandparents for adoption under section 63.082(6) affirmed; no error in interpreting the statute.

Issues
Placement & ICPC, Adoption after termination
Facts
Relative or grandparent caregiver
Law cited
§ 63.082(6)

Summary, issues, facts, outcome, and appellant were extracted automatically from the opinion. Check the opinion itself before relying on them.

Court's PDF On CourtListener
                                      IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                                      FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN                NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO AND FAMILIES and                      FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND GUARDIAN AD LITEM                     DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED PROGRAM,
                                      CASE NO. 1D15-4198
      Appellants, v. T.H. & C.H., PATERNAL GRANDPARENTS OF J.R., A MINOR CHILD,
      Appellees. _____________________________/ Opinion filed March 10, 2016. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County. Marci L. Goodman, Judge. Dennis W. Moore, Thomasina Moore, and Wendie Michelle Cooper, Sanford, for Appellant Guardian Ad Litem Program; Dwight O. Slater, Appellate Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellant Department of Children and Families. No appearance for Appellees.


PER CURIAM.
      We affirm the dependency court’s order placing J.R. with Appellees for adoption pursuant to section 63.082(6), Florida Statutes (2015), because we find no error in the court’s interpretation and application of the statute under the circumstances of this case. Additionally, for what it’s worth, we note that many of the policy concerns with the statute articulated by the dependency court at the hearing below (and echoed by Appellants in their briefs) appear to have been addressed by recently-approved legislation. See Fla. CS for CS for CS for SB 590, § 2 (2016) (Enrolled) (substantially amending § 63.082(6), Fla. Stat.).
      AFFIRMED. WETHERELL, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR. 

Opinion text: CourtListener, Free Law Project. Not an official reporter; check the court's version before citing.