Dependency Law Finder

Florida's dependency statutes, court rules and DCF operating procedures, with the appellate opinions that apply them

data.robertlathamesq.org · All tools

Before you use this site

This site aggregates legal authorities from a variety of public sources. It is AI and human reviewed. Text processing errors can occur. Always check the information here against the official linked source.

This site is publicly available. Use for general research only. Do not submit confidential or identifiable case information.

I don't agree: show the official sources

S.M. v. Department of Children & Families848 So. 2d 431 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) · 1D02-4616

Court
1st DCA
Decided
2003-07-02
Case
TPR
Appellant
Mother

Reversed Termination reversed because DCF did not make reasonable efforts to reunite the mother with her children, as the case plan ground requires.

Issues
TPR ground: case plan noncompliance / continuing abuse, Disposition, case plan & reasonable efforts
Law cited
§ 39.806(1)(e) (now § 39.806(1)(e)1.)

Summary, issues, facts, outcome, and appellant were extracted automatically from the opinion. Check the opinion itself before relying on them.

On CourtListener
PER CURIAM.

The Department did not meet its statutory duties in this case because it did not make “reasonable efforts” to reunite the mother and her children, as required by section 39.806(1)(e), Florida Statutes (2002). For this reason, we reverse the *432order terminating the mother’s parental rights.

WOLF, C.J., and ERVIN, J., concur; BENTON, J., dissents.

Opinion text: CourtListener, Free Law Project. Not an official reporter; check the court's version before citing.